Candace Aguilera, aka Candace Sgaggio v. City of Colorado Springs, Colorado, et al.
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
How long can government agents stay on private spiritual property after implied license is revoked?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I ask the Supreme Court to clarify how long the government agents, can stay on the Private spiritual property and continue to search, after the implied license to knock and talk to has been revoked. The 10 circuit applies two cases to shut down my spiritual free exercise claims by leaping over fourth amendment protections. In , United States v. Carloss, 818 F.3d 988, 990 (10th Cir. 2016) consent was given and a Carloss led officers to his room. In United States v. Shuck, 713 F.3d 563, 568 (10th Cir. 2013) nobody was even home. However in my case, I was present. I objected to the search not once but twice. Then I left my spiritual property because officers would not leave, and threatened me. Defendant Marshall Mc Clarin became angry and threatened plaintiff I Candace Aguilera, “If you do not let us in, nobody will be allowed in”. (Doc# 01110251778, P.120) This case is almost identical to Sause v. Bauer, 138 S. Ct. 2561, 129 S. Ct. 315, 201 L. Ed. 2d 982, 172 L. Ed. 2d 229 (2018). The 10th Circuit will not recognize womans Spiritual rights. I am an indigenous woman born in the Farming community of Lamar Colorado. I am a member of a protected class under the 14t amendment. I don’t have an attorney but I do have Faith. ;