I.
WHETHER REASONABLE JURISTS COULD
DIFFER AS TO WHETHER PETITIONER WAS
DEPRIVED OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT
TO DUE PROCESS AND TO TRIAL BY JURY
WHEN THE STATE COURT REFUSED TO INSTRUCT THE JURY ON LESSER INCLUDED
OFFENSES TO MICHIGAN'S FIRST-DEGREE
"CAPITAL" MURDER CHARGE.

II.
WHETHER JURISTS OF REASON COULD
FIND IT DEBATABLE WHETHER THE ERRONEOUS JURY INSTRUCTION ON UNANIMITY
WAS PROCEDURALLY DEFAULTED.

III.
THE RIGHT OF CONFRONTATION AND BRADY
VIOLATIONS.

IV.
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT.

V.
ADMISSION OF OTHER BAD ACTS.

VI.
WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DEPRIVED OF
EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.

whether-petitioner-was-deprived-of-due-process-and-jury-trial