whether-petitioner-was-deprived-of-due-process-and-jury-trial

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. WHETHER REASONABLE JURISTS COULD DIFFER AS TO WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DEPRIVED OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS AND TO TRIAL BY JURY WHEN THE STATE COURT REFUSED TO INSTRUCT THE JURY ON LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSES TO MICHIGAN’S FIRST-DEGREE “CAPITAL” MURDER CHARGE. II. WHETHER JURISTS OF REASON COULD FIND IT DEBATABLE WHETHER THE ERRONEOUS JURY INSTRUCTION ON UNANIMITY WAS PROCEDURALLY DEFAULTED. III. THE RIGHT OF CONFRONTATION AND BRADY VIOLATIONS. IV. PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT. V. ADMISSION OF OTHER BAD ACTS. VI. WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DEPRIVED OF EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.