No. 20-16

Edward Wayne Binns v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights collateral-estoppel due-process eeoc-complaint equitable-tolling extraordinary-circumstances res-judicata standing title-vii
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an EEOC complaint filing would be timely for a Title 7 action under Holland-v-Florida equitable tolling principles

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 6 q WHETHER AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 8 COMPLAINT FILING, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 WOULD BE TIMELY FILED FOR A TITLE 7 ACTION, UNDER THE 10 HOLLAND -vFLORIDA, 560 U. S. 631 (2010 ), U S SUPREME COURT 1 EQUITABLE TOLLING PRINCIPLES WHEREAS IN THIS INSTANT 12 PETITIONER'S CASE, EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES STOOD 13 IN HIS WAY AND PREVENTED TIMELY FILING OF APPEAL FROM 14 EEOC DECISION, AND OR ITS INCORRECT FILING UNDER 42 USC 15 1983 RESULTING IN RES JUDICATA AND COLLATERIAL ESTOPPEL 16 ; RECOVERY BAR? 17 . 18 19 20 21 22 23 , 24 25 26 27 28

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
Main Document
2020-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 12, 2020)
PetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Edward Wayne Binns
Edward Wayne Binns — Petitioner
Edward Wayne Binns — Petitioner
United States, et al.
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent