Does the First Amendment allow a state to criminalize protected speech by means of a statute aimed at prohibiting the nonconsensual dissemination of sexual images when that statute lacks an intent-to-harm requirement and employs a negligence mens rea?

QUESTION PRESENTED Does the First Amendment allow a state to criminalize protected speech by means of a statute aimed at prohibiting the nonconsensual dissemination of sexual images when that statute lacks an intent-to-harm requirement and employs a negligence mens rea? The Minnesota Supreme Court upheld a Minnesota statute under a strict scrutiny analysis despite the Court’s holding that the statute prohibits more than obscenity. i