| 24-1094 |
Louis B. Antonacci v. Rahm Emanuel, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-04-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
cyberespionage due-process protected-speech racketeering rico-enterprise subject-matter-jurisdiction |
Whether Petitioner Antonacci has properly alleged that Respondents are architects of a criminal RICO enterprise engaged in racketeering activity again… |
| 23-1188 |
Jonathon Owen Shroyer v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2024-05-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appeal-waiver first-amendment free-speech protected-speech relevant-conduct relevant-offense-conduct sentencing substantive-reasonableness |
Whether a prison sentence imposed as a result of the consideration of protected speech as 'relevant offense conduct' violates the First Amendment and … |
| 23-1122 |
Free Speech Coalition, Inc., et al. v. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-04-16 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (45)Relisted (2) |
adults-access constitutional-rights content-based-restriction first-amendment free-speech protected-speech rational-basis rational-basis-review strict-scrutiny |
Whether the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying rational-basis review to a law burdening adults' access to protected speech, instead… |
| 23-7158 |
Russell Dean Alford v. United States |
District of Columbia |
2024-04-08 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
criminal-law due-process first-amendment free-speech overbreadth political-expression protected-speech secret-service statutory-interpretation vagueness |
Whether 'disorderly' and 'disruptive' in 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2) and 40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D) narrow the types of conduct criminalized, or refer only … |
| 23-895 |
Richard Rogalinski v. Meta Platforms, Inc. |
Ninth Circuit |
2024-02-21 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
censorship civil-procedure civil-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech protected-speech social-media standing state-action |
Whether the Petitioner sufficiently stated a claim for relief under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution |
| 23-156 |
Speech First, Inc. v. Timothy Sands, Individually and in His Official Capacity as President of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University |
Fourth Circuit |
2023-08-17 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (10)Relisted (9) |
bias-response-team bias-response-teams chilling-effect circuit-split first-amendment free-speech protected-speech student-rights university-administration |
Do bias-response teams objectively chill students' free speech? |
| 21-716 |
David Sivella v. Township of Lyndhurst, New Jersey, et al. |
Third Circuit |
2021-11-15 |
Denied |
|
criminal-investigation employer-liability first-amendment free-speech protected-speech public-employment retaliation whistleblower |
Does the First Amendment bar a public employer from initiating a baseless criminal investigation in retaliation for a public employee engaging in prot… |
| 21-6221 |
David Jackson v. Massachusetts Department of Correction |
Massachusetts |
2021-11-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech prisoner-rights protected-speech racial-discrimination solitary-confinement true-threat |
Whether petitioner's letter constitutes protected speech or a true threat |
| 21-213 |
Nathaniel Borrell Dyer v. Atlanta Independent School System |
Eleventh Circuit |
2021-08-13 |
Denied |
|
due-process first-amendment free-speech limited-public-forum protected-speech public-figures public-forum satirical-flyer satirical-speech viewpoint-discrimination |
Whether Atlanta Independent School System violated Mr. Dyer's First Amendment right to free-speech by categorically banning him from using protected-s… |
| 20-1635 |
Michael Anthony Casillas v. Minnesota |
Minnesota |
2021-05-24 |
Denied |
|
civil-rights criminal-law criminal-statute due-process first-amendment free-speech mens-rea nonconsensual-dissemination obscenity protected-speech strict-scrutiny |
Does the First Amendment allow a state to criminalize protected speech by means of a statute aimed at prohibiting the nonconsensual dissemination of s… |
| 20-5220 |
Gerald Lee Groomes v. Arkansas |
Arkansas |
2020-07-30 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
child-nudity child-pornography constitutional-rights criminal-statute first-amendment lewd-exhibition overbreadth protected-expression protected-speech vagueness |
Does a state's unreasonable application of a criminal statute prohibiting the possession of images depicting a 'lewd exhibition' of child nudity in a … |
| 19-771 |
Gerald Sensabaugh v. Kimberly Halliburton, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2019-12-16 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-procedure civil-rights common-law due-process first-amendment free-speech personnel-file protected-speech public-employee qualified-immunity retaliation standing takings |
Whether the Court should reconsider its qualified-immunity jurisprudence to accord with the official's burden of establishing immunity entitlement at … |
| 18-722 |
Soundboard Association v. Federal Trade Commission |
District of Columbia |
2018-12-06 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Relisted (4) |
administrative-procedure administrative-procedure-act agency-rulemaking arbitrary-and-capricious chilled-speech chilling-effect federal-trade-commission judicial-review protected-speech rulemaking staff-advisory-opinion |
Do Petitioners have a right to judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act of a Federal Trade Commission staff advisory opinion that effect… |
| 18-696 |
Center for Medical Progress, et al. v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-11-27 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
anti-SLAPP circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-procedure federalism first-amendment free-speech heightened-pleading investigative-journalism protected-speech |
Should the Ninth Circuit have applied the anti-SLAPP statutes? |
| 18-6272 |
Gregory Steshenko v. Thomas McKay, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2018-10-10 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
academic-expulsion civil-procedure civil-rights disciplinary-expulsion due-process education employment fourteenth-amendment free-speech mixed-motive mixed-motive-defense protected-speech spoliation-of-evidence standing |
Whether the mixed-motive defense doctrine of Mt. Healthy City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 287 (1977) in employment terminations fo… |