No. 20-5220
Gerald Lee Groomes v. Arkansas
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: child-nudity child-pornography constitutional-rights criminal-statute first-amendment lewd-exhibition overbreadth protected-expression protected-speech vagueness
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a state's unreasonable application of a criminal statute prohibiting the possession of images depicting a 'lewd exhibition' of child nudity in a manner that infringes on a substantial amount of protected expression violate the First Amendment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Does a state’s unreasonable application of a criminal statute prohibiting the possession of images depicting a “lewd exhibition” of child nudity in a manner that infringes on a substantial amount of protected expression violate the First Amendment? i
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-28
Waiver of right of respondent State of Arkansas to respond filed.
2020-04-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 31, 2020)
Attorneys
Gerald Lee Groomes
Benjamin Eric Motal — Law Office of Ben Motal, Petitioner
Benjamin Eric Motal — Law Office of Ben Motal, Petitioner
State of Arkansas