No. 23-1188
Jonathon Owen Shroyer v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: appeal-waiver first-amendment free-speech protected-speech relevant-conduct relevant-offense-conduct sentencing substantive-reasonableness
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment DueProcess
FirstAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a prison sentence imposed as a result of the consideration of protected speech as 'relevant offense conduct' violates the First Amendment and is substantively unreasonable?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a prison sentence imposed as a result of the consideration of protected speech as “relevant offense conduct” violates the First Amendment and is substantively unreasonable? 2. Whether an appeal waiver is enforceable when a defendant’s First Amendment rights are violated at sentencing?
Docket Entries
2024-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
2024-05-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-04-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 3, 2024)
Attorneys
Jonathon Owen Shroyer
Robert Edward Barnes — Barnes law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent