Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a group health plan that provides uniform reimbursement of all dialysis treatments observes the Medicare Secondary Payer Act's prohibition on taking into account a plan participant's Medicare eligibility
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Congress enacted the Medicare Secondary Payer Act as a means to conserve Medicare resources. Among other things, the Act provides that group health plans may not “take into account” the fact that a plan participant with end stage renal disease is eligible for Medicare benefits. Does a group health plan that provides uniform reimbursement of all dialysis treatments observe that prohibition? (2) Under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act, a group health plan also may not “differentiate” between individuals with end stage renal disease and others “in the benefits it provides.” Does a plan that provides the same dialysis benefits to all plan participants, and reimburses dialysis providers uniformly regardless of whether the patient has end stage renal disease, observe that prohibition? (3) Is the Medicare Secondary Payer Act a measure designed to protect Medicare, not an antidiscrimination law designed to protect certain providers from alleged disparate impact of uniform treatment?
2022-06-21
Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kavanaugh, J., delivered the <a href = 'https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-1641_3314.pdf'>opinion</a> of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Kagan, J., filed an opinion dissenting in part, in which Sotomayor, J., joined.
2022-03-01
Argued. For petitioners: John J. Kulewicz, Columbus, Ohio. For United States, as amicus curiae: Matthew Guarnieri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Seth P. Waxman, Washington, D. C.
2022-02-18
Reply of petitioners Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2022-02-18
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument GRANTED.
2022-02-02
Letter of respondents to Clerk regarding disclaimer filed.
2022-01-28
Corrected proof of service with respect to vrief amicus curiae of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People filed.
2022-01-26
Brief amici curiae of Kidney Care Council and Renal Healthcare Association filed. (Distributed)
2022-01-26
Brief amicus curiae of Congressman William Thomas filed. (Distributed)
2022-01-26
Brief amicus curiae of Kidney Care Partners filed. (Distributed)
2022-01-26
Brief amicus curiae of Thomas A. Scully filed. (Distributed)
2022-01-26
Brief amicus curiae of National Association for the Advancement of Colored People filed. (Distributed)
2022-01-26
Brief amicus curiae of Dialysis Patient Citizens filed. (Distributed)
2022-01-24
Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae, for divided argument, and for enlargement of time for oral argument filed.
2022-01-19
Brief of respondents Davita Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-12-27
The record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit has been electronically filed.
2021-12-23
Brief amicus curiae of Self-Insurance Institute of America, Inc. filed.
2021-12-23
Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.
2021-12-22
Brief amici curiae of Pacific Health Coalition, et al. filed.
2021-12-21
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.
2021-12-20
Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
2021-12-20
Brief of petitioners Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan, et al. filed.
2021-12-17
ARGUMENT SET FOR Tuesday, March 1, 2022.
2021-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/5/2021.
2021-10-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-10-04
Reply of petitioners Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-09-20
Brief of respondents Davita Inc., et al. in opposition filed.
2021-08-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 20, 2021.
2021-08-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 20, 2021 to September 20, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-07-21
Response Requested. (Due August 20, 2021)
2021-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent Davita Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2021-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 24, 2021)