No. 20-1778

Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2021-06-23
Status: Judgment Issued
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Relisted (4) Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law agency-authority carbon-emissions clean-air-act clean-power-plan energy-policy environmental-regulation epa hazardous-air-pollutants section-111(d) section-112 statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2021-10-29 (distributed 4 times)
Related Cases: 20-1530 (Vide) 20-1531 (Vide) 20-1780 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether EPA may employ 42 U.S.C. § 7411(d) to impose standards of performance on existing stationary sources that are regulated under the 'hazardous air pollutants' program of 42 U.S.C. § 7412

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Clean Air Act Section 111(d), 42 U.S.C. § 7411(d), authorizes EPA to impose standards of performance for existing sources’ emission of certain pollutants. In American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut, 564 U.S. 410, 424 (2011), this Court endorsed EPA’s longstanding view that it may not apply Section 111(d) to sources that are already regulated under the Act’s stringent Section 112 “hazardous air pollutants” program. Nonetheless, EPA promulgated its “Clean Power Plan” to impose carbon dioxide emission limits under Section 111(d) on coal-fired power plants that are already regulated under Section 112. “[O]ne of the most consequential rules ever proposed by an administrative agency,” Pet.App.172a, the Clean Power Plan would fundamentally transform the U.S. energy system by “shifting” generation from fossil-fuel-fired plants to other sources of electricity. After EPA repealed the Clean Power Plan as ultra vires, the D.C. Circuit vacated that action on the ground that Section 111(d) effectively places “no limits” on EPA. Accordingly, the questions presented are: 1. Whether EPA may employ 42 U.S.C. § 7411(d) to impose standards of performance on existing stationary sources that are regulated under the “hazardous air pollutants” program of 42 U.S.C. § 7412. 2. Whether 42 U.S.C. § 7411(d) clearly authorizes EPA to decide such matters of vast economic and political significance as whether and how to restructure the nation’s energy system.

Docket Entries

2022-08-01
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-01-18
CIRCULATED
2021-12-23
The record from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer. The oral argument transcript has been electronically filed.
2021-12-21
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit.
2021-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-10-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-08-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-24
Reply of petitioner Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC filed. (Distributed)
2021-07-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 5, 2021, for all respondents.
2021-07-22
Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.
2021-07-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 23, 2021 to August 5, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-06-25
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
2021-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 23, 2021)

Attorneys

Consolidated Edison, Inc., Exelon Corporation, National Grid USA, New York Power Authority, Power Companies Climate Coalition, and Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Beth Susan BrinkmannCovington & Burling LLP, Respondent
Beth Susan BrinkmannCovington & Burling LLP, Respondent
Federal respondents
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Non-Governmental Organization and Trade Association Respondents
Sean Hoe DonahueDonahue, Goldberg & Littleton, Respondent
Sean Hoe DonahueDonahue, Goldberg & Littleton, Respondent
States and Municipalities
Barbara Dale UnderwoodSolicitor General, Respondent
Barbara Dale UnderwoodSolicitor General, Respondent
The Cato Institute
Ilya ShapiroCato Institute, Amicus
Ilya ShapiroCato Institute, Amicus
Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Andrew Michael GrossmanBaker & Hostetler LLP, Petitioner
Andrew Michael GrossmanBaker & Hostetler LLP, Petitioner