No. 20-1780

North Dakota v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2021-06-23
Status: Judgment Issued
Type: Paid
Amici (3)Relisted (4) Experienced Counsel
Tags: clean-air-act environmental-law environmental-protection-agency epa-regulations federalism performance-standards state-implementation stationary-sources
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-10-29 (distributed 4 times)
Related Cases: 20-1530 (Vide) 20-1531 (Vide) 20-1778 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can EPA promulgate regulations for existing stationary sources that require States to apply binding nationwide 'performance standards' at a level, instead of at the individual source level, and can those regulations deprive States of all implementation and decision making power in creating their Section 111(d) plans?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 7411(d), governs air emissions from stationary sources of air pollutants. Section 111(d) explicitly requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to develop guidelines for the States to create their own Section 111(d) plans to establish “standards of performance” for controlling air emissions from any individual “existing source.” Section 111(d)(1) further provides that EPA guidelines “shall permit” States, in developing their plans, to “take into consideration, among other factors, the remaining useful life of the existing source to which such standard applies.” The question presented is: Can EPA promulgate regulations for existing stationary sources that require States to apply binding nationwide “performance standards” at a level, instead of at the individual source level, and can those regulations deprive States of all implementation and decision making power in creating their Section 111(d) plans?

Docket Entries

2022-08-01
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-01-18
CIRCULATED
2021-12-23
The record from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer. The oral argument transcript has been electronically filed.
2021-12-21
Record requested from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit.
2021-10-29
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Lignite Energy Council GRANTED.
2021-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-10-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.
2021-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-08-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-23
Reply of petitioner State of North Dakota filed. (Distributed)
2021-07-23
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Lignite Energy Council.
2021-07-22
Brief amici curiae of South Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc., et al. filed.
2021-07-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 5, 2021, for all respondents.
2021-07-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 23, 2021 to August 5, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-06-28
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, State of North Dakota
2021-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 23, 2021)

Attorneys

Consolidated Edison, Inc., Exelon Corporation, National Grid USA, New York Power Authority, Power Companies Climate Coalition, and Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Beth Susan BrinkmannCovington & Burling LLP, Respondent
Federal respondents
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Non-Governmental Organization and Trade Association Respondents
Sean Hoe DonahueDonahue, Goldberg & Littleton, Respondent
South Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc., et al
Michael John NasiJackson Walker L.L.P., Amicus
State of North Dakota
Paul Martin SebyGreenberg Traurig LLP, Petitioner
States and Municipalities
Barbara Dale UnderwoodSolicitor General, Respondent