Whether this Court's decision in Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006, clearly establishes that a defendant's due process right to present evidence is violated by a state rule which arbitrarily excludes expert testimony on eyewitness identification merely because there is evidence of defendant's guilt apart from the eyewitness identification

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether this Court’s decision in Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006, clearly establishes that a defendant’s due process right to present evidence is violated by a state rule which arbitrarily excludes expert testimony on eyewitness identification merely because there is evidence of defendant’s guilt apart from the eyewitness identification.