holmes-v-south-carolina
4 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23-1043 | Amir Anariba v. California | California | 2024-03-21 | Denied | Response Waived | arbitrary-rules compulsory-process criminal-defense due-process evidence-rules holmes-v-south-carolina right-to-present-defense sixth-amendment subpoena-duces-tecum united-states-v-nixon | The Constitution guarantees criminal defendants a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense. This right is abridged by evidence rules that … |
| 21-7409 | Jory Russell Strizich v. Montana | Montana | 2022-03-17 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | criminal-defense due-process evidentiary-ruling evidentiary-rulings flight-evidence fourteenth-amendment holmes-precedent holmes-v-south-carolina sixth-amendment | Whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to defend in a criminal case can be denied on unique state evidentiary rulings? Stated another way, d… |
| 20-1042 | Pedro Hernandez v. New York | New York | 2021-01-29 | Denied | Response Waived | constitutional-evidence criminal-procedure due-process evidence federal-rules-of-evidence holmes-precedent holmes-v-south-carolina relevance-standard third-party-guilt | This Court has long held that a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to introduce evidence suggesting that someone else committed the crime c… |
| 20-232 | Robert Anderson v. Teri Kennedy | Seventh Circuit | 2020-08-27 | Denied | Amici (1)Response Waived | constitutional-rights due-process evidence-exclusion expert-testimony eyewitness-identification holmes-precedent holmes-v-south-carolina state-rule | Whether this Court's decision in Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006), clearly establishes that a defendant's due process right to present ev… |