No. 20-301

Timothy B. Hennis v. United States

Lower Court: Armed Forces
Docketed: 2020-09-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)
Tags: capital-punishment constitutional-provisions court-martial double-jeopardy due-process military-justice military-law state-court-acquittal state-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the offenses for which Petitioner was tried and acquitted in state court constituted offenses 'for which [he] cannot be tried in the courts of... any State'

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Petitioner was a Soldier in the U.S. Army when, in 1989, a North Carolina court acquitted him of capital murder. Following a break in his military status, Petitioner continued serving in the Army until his retirement in 2004. In 2010, a courtmartial sentenced Petitioner to death for the same charges underlying his prior acquittal. Because of the break in Petitioner’s military service, the courtmartial could not try him unless the charges were ones “for which [he] cannot be tried in the courts of... any State.” 10 U.S.C. § 803(a) (1982). This case presents the following questions: 1. Whether the offenses for which Petitioner was tried and acquitted in state court constituted offenses “for which [he] cannot be tried in the courts of... any State.” 2. Whether 10 U.S.C. § 803(a) is unconstitutional insofar as it allowed the government to courtmartial Petitioner only because the Double Jeopardy Clause would have barred his retrial in a state court. 3. Whether the Constitution bars the military from subjecting servicemembers to capital trials for non-military offenses.

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-05
Letter of January 5, 2021, from counsel for petitioner filed. (Distributed)
2020-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-21
Reply of petitioner Timothy B. Hennis filed. (Distributed)
2020-12-09
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2020-11-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 9, 2020.
2020-11-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 9, 2020 to December 9, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-10-08
Brief amicus curiae of Air Force Appellate Defense Division filed.
2020-10-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 9, 2020.
2020-09-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 9, 2020 to November 9, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 9, 2020)

Attorneys

Air Force Appellate Defense Division
Mark Clifford BrueggerU.S. Air Force, Amicus
Timothy B. Hennis
Timothy Gerard Burroughs Jr.Defense Appellate Division, United States Army Legal Services Agency, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. WallActing Solicitor General, Respondent