| 25-6423 |
Ammar al Baluchi, aka Ali Abdul Aziz Ali v. Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Defense |
District of Columbia |
2025-12-23 |
Pending |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review detainee-rights geneva-convention jurisdiction military-law mixed-medical-commission |
Whether the Court of Appeals erred by denying jurisdiction over Petitioner's appeal. In particular, did the Court of Appeals err by interpreting provi… |
| 25-727 |
Douglas M. Folts v. United States |
Armed Forces |
2025-12-19 |
Pending |
Response Waived |
constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech military-law obscenity-standard servicemembers |
Whether the military's obscenity standard is unconstitutional under Parker v. Levy and Miller v. California. |
| 25-82 |
Malcolm Wade Pipes v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2025-07-22 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-procedure disability-retirement inactive-duty-training military-law military-reservist statutory-interpretation |
Whether a military reservist, who was lawfully ordered to engage in remedial fitness training without pay and points, and suffered injury, was on inac… |
| 24-1241 |
Adam Kelnhofer v. United States |
Armed Forces |
2025-06-05 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
burden-of-proof constitutional-inference drug-testing due-process military-law scientific-evidence |
Whether the inference allowing a trier of fact to find knowing use of a drug based solely on the presence of a metabolite in a defendant's body, even … |
| 23-113 |
Michael G. Pohl v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2023-08-04 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
10-usc-1552 28-usc-1491 administrative-appeal administrative-procedure jurisdictional-challenge military-law military-records standard-of-review statutory-interpretation tucker-act |
What is the proper standard of review for an appeal to correct a military record under 10 U.S.C. § 1552 or 28 U.S.C. § 1491? |
| 21-6388 |
Calvin Roach v. Donald W. Washington, Director, United States Marshals Service, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2021-11-23 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
14th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-duty due-process federal-law legal-interpretation military-law military-oath oath-of-office retiree-obligations standing |
Whether military retirees are bound by their Oath to protect the United States Constitution against foreign and domestic enemies |
| 21-6021 |
Elroy William Robinson v. David Holbrook, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-10-20 |
Denied |
IFP |
5th-amendment 6th-amendment civil-rights due-process jurisdiction military-law |
Whether the military court-martial jurisdiction extends to a civilian spouse of an active-duty service member |
| 20-6562 |
Reynaldo Salinas v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
2020-12-08 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
air-force air-force-office-of-special-investigations civil-rights civilian-employee constitutional-rights due-process federal-tort-claims-act law-enforcement military-law posse-comitatus-act special-investigations standing |
Was this a Military or Civilian investigation? |
| 20-446 |
James W. Richards, IV v. Barbara M. Barrett, Secretary of the Air Force, et al. |
Armed Forces |
2020-10-08 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
article-i article-i-courts article-iii article-iii-courts collateral-claims federal-courts jurisdictional-issue military-courts military-law military-prisoners |
Should military-specific collateral claims raised by military prisoners still subject to military law be adjudicated in the specialized, experienced A… |
| 20-301 |
Timothy B. Hennis v. United States |
Armed Forces |
2020-09-09 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
capital-punishment constitutional-provisions court-martial double-jeopardy due-process military-justice military-law state-court-acquittal state-jurisdiction |
Whether the offenses for which Petitioner was tried and acquitted in state court constituted offenses 'for which [he] cannot be tried in the courts of… |
| 19-6806 |
Anthony J. Stokes v. Florida |
Florida |
2019-12-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal civil-rights constitutional-review criminal-procedure criminal-prosecution double-jeopardy due-process felony jurisdictional-conflict military-law predicate-felony sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation trial-modification |
Whether the underlying felony is part of the crime charged to create a predicate felony that charge, cannot stand |
| 18-1423 |
Paul E. Cooper v. United States |
Armed Forces |
2019-05-14 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
10-usc-867c article-i-authority court-of-appeals-for-the-armed-forces johnson-v-united-states judicial-review matter-of-fact matters-of-fact matters-of-law military-appeals-court-authority military-appellate-review military-law navy-marine-corps-court-of-criminal-appeals statutory-authority statutory-interpretation |
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces exceeded its statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. § 867(c) when it took action with res… |
| 18-1383 |
James M. Hale v. United States |
Armed Forces |
2019-05-03 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
10-usc-802 court-martial court-martial-jurisdiction general-verdict judicial-deference jurisdictional-defects jurisdictional-limits legal-sufficiency military-discipline military-discipline-jurisdiction military-law overt-acts plain-error rostker-v-goldberg sufficiency-of-evidence weiss-v-united-states |
Whether the court-martial had jurisdiction over the charged conduct |
| 18-8101 |
Lawrence Montgomery Foltz v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2019-02-22 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process jurisdiction military-law military-records property-rights standing takings veterans-affairs |
Do the chattels and loans of an American soldier come under the jurisdiction of this court's record and receive the full protection of record? |
| 18-6011 |
Irek Ilgiz Hamidullin v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
2018-09-17 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
armed-conflict article-iii-court battlefield-conduct combatant-detention common-law-defense criminal-prosecution foreign-soldiers international-law military-law war-crimes |
Whether Army Regulation 190-8 requires an individual determination of legal status as a prerequisite to criminal prosecution of combatants for battlef… |