No. 25-1149
Michael J. Hymel v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-discretion court-martial guilty-plea military-law providence-inquiry standard-of-review
Latest Conference:
2026-05-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces abuse its discretion under 10 U.S.C. § 867 (a)(3) by failing to grant review "upon petition of the accused and on good cause shown," where Petitioner made an unrebutted showing of good cause?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces abused its discretion under 10 U.S.C. § 867(a)(3) by failing to grant review upon petition of the accused where petitioner made an unrebutted showing of good cause
Docket Entries
2026-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/1/2026.
2026-04-09
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2026-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2026-03-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 4, 2026)
2026-03-12
Application (25A997) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until May 15, 2026.
2026-03-09
Application (25A997) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 16, 2026 to May 15, 2026, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Michael J. Hymel
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent