Whether the Court of Appeals erred by denying jurisdiction over Petitioner's appeal and interpreting provisions of the Third Geneva Convention regarding Guantanamo Bay detainees

The Question Presented is: Whether the Court of Appeals erred by denying jurisdiction over Petitioner’s appeal. In particular, did the Court of Appeals err by interpreting provisions of the Third Geneva Convention, incorporated by Army Regulation 190 -8, to allow the United States discretion over the implementation of Mixed Medical Commission conclusions regarding sick and injured Guantanamo Bay detainees ?