No. 25-82
Malcolm Wade Pipes v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-procedure disability-retirement inactive-duty-training military-law military-reservist statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a military reservist on ordered remedial fitness training without pay and points, who suffered injury, was on inactive duty training status within the meaning of 10 U.S.C. § 101(d)(7)(B) and entitled to disability retirement
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Whether a military reservist, who was lawfully ordered to engage in remedial fitness training without pay and points, and suffered injury, was on inactive¬ duty training status while performing ordered military training within the meaning of 10 U.S.C. § 101(d)(7)(B) and, therefore, entitled to disability retirement.
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-15
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-08-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-07-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 21, 2025)
2025-05-29
Application (24A1155) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until July 18, 2025.
2025-05-23
Application (24A1155) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 3, 2025 to July 18, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Malcolm Wade Pipes
Mathew B. Tully — Tully Rinckey PLLC, Petitioner
Mathew B. Tully — Tully Rinckey PLLC, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent