No. 20-392
Fatmata Kamara v. New Jersey, Department of Law and Public Safety, Division of State Police
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights collective-bargaining conscientious-employee-protection-act due-process employment-discrimination employment-law law-against-discrimination police-misconduct state-police-procedure time-bar
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Termination-without-due-process
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question Presented A rule was violated because No Statement was Obtained From Me For the Preliminary Hearing and Yet I was Terminated. State Police Counsel used Law Against Discrimination (LAD) and Conscientious Employee Protect Act) (CEPA) to sweep their unjustified actions against me, under the rug, and also a pretext to dismissed my case and the use of time barred. .
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-05-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 26, 2020)