No. 20-5018

Roy Howard Middleton v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-court-interpretation criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process federal-law-application habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review legal-precedent stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Securities
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the courts apply SCOTUS precedent in Price v. Georgia and Strickland v. Washington correctly?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Petitioner asks did the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and the District Court for the Northern District of Florida apply federal law issued by the Supreme Court of the United States in a way that frustrates and undermines its holdings set forth in Price v. Georgia, 398 U.S. 323, 90 S. Ct. 1757, ' 26 L, Ed. 2d 300 (1970) (citing Green v. United States, 355 US 184, 78 S.Ct. 221 2 L. Ed. 199, 205, 61 ALR2D 1119 (1957))? II. ‘Petitioner asks did the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and the District Court for the Northern District of Florida apply federal law issued by the Supreme Court of the United States in a way that frustrates and undermines its holdings set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed, 2d 674 (1984)? 1

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 10, 2020)

Attorneys

Roy H. Middleton
Roy Howard Middleton Jr. — Petitioner
Roy Howard Middleton Jr. — Petitioner