| 23-6833 |
Jason Matthew Karr v. Colorado |
Colorado |
2024-02-26 |
Denied |
IFP |
appointment-of-counsel clearly-established-federal-law colorado-supreme-court constitutional-review due-process-rights evidentiary-hearing federal-law-application ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington |
whether-the-colorado-supreme-court-held-the-petitioner-to-a-higher-standard-for-pleading-ineffective-assistance-of-counsel |
| 21-8019 |
Levelt Dewarren Musgraves v. Wisconsin |
Wisconsin |
2022-06-01 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights due-process equal-protection federal-law-application juvenile-lifers parole sentencing sentencing-modification state-court-review |
Whether the Wisconsin state courts failed to conduct a complete review of the Public Interest Justice Initiative (PIJI) sentencing issue, and whether … |
| 20-6617 |
In Re Theresa Romain |
|
2020-12-14 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-law federal-law-application judicial-error justice-standard legal-interpretation standing state-court state-court-review |
Can a State Court applied clearly established Federal Law erroneously or incorrectly as to cause harm to a Petitioner? |
| 20-5018 |
Roy Howard Middleton v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-07-09 |
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review circuit-court-interpretation criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process federal-law-application habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review legal-precedent stare-decisis supreme-court-precedent |
Did the courts apply SCOTUS precedent in Price v. Georgia and Strickland v. Washington correctly? |
| 19-8413 |
Troy Pope v. Jefferson S. Dunn, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections |
Eleventh Circuit |
2020-05-07 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
28-usc-2254 actual-innocence cause-and-prejudice federal-law-application federal-state-comity habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel procedural-default state-court-decision |
Whether the Alabama state courts and federal district court unreasonably applied clearly established federal law in denying habeas relief to the petit… |