Whether the Wisconsin state courts failed to conduct a complete review of the Public Interest Justice Initiative (PIJI) sentencing issue, and whether the PIJI program lacks legal authority and violates equal protection and non-disclosure rights of juvenile lifers

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. The Wisconsin state courts did not conduct a complete round of the Public Interest Justice Initiative (PIJI) sentencing issue presented before the Milwaukee county circuit court which refuses to address the issue. 2. The state of Wisconsin has attached and established that PIJI as a sentencing matter to be conducted "not unlike" the individualized nature of sentencing in Wisconsin. 3. The PIJI is a sentencing modification program for parole eligible juvenile lifers sentenced in the 1990's, but there is no law or policy within authority of the state of Wisconsin's highest court; no legislative intent or legislation and the program contains non-disclosure, violation of equal protection, and discrimination within a suspect class of the juvenile lifers sentenced in the 1990's. 4. The Wisconsin state courts decision are an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by the United States Supreme . Court, and is also contrary to it's own state precedent. 2 PARTIES AND RELATED CASES | The petitioner is Levelt Musgraves, proceeding pro se, a juvenile lifer from the state of Wisconsin. The Respondents are the State of Wisconsin, the Milwaukee county district attorney's office, the Legal Aid Society of Milwaukee, and Phillip Torsrud see April 5, 2021).