No. 23-6833

Jason Matthew Karr v. Colorado

Lower Court: Colorado
Docketed: 2024-02-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appointment-of-counsel clearly-established-federal-law colorado-supreme-court constitutional-review due-process-rights evidentiary-hearing federal-law-application ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-the-colorado-supreme-court-held-the-petitioner-to-a-higher-standard-for-pleading-ineffective-assistance-of-counsel

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Colorado Supreme Court held the Petitioner to a standard for pleading deficient performance and prejudice in his claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, which was higher than the standard established by this Court’s holding in Strickland v. Washington? 2. Whether the Colorado Supreme Court unreasonably applied the governing principles of clearly established federal law created by this Court’s holding in Strickland v. Washington? 3. Whether the state courts decisions should be reversed and case remanded for an evidentiary hearing, and appointment of counsel in order to address the Petitioner's meritorious ineffective assistance of counsel claims? i

Docket Entries

2024-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2024)

Attorneys

Jason Karr
Jason Matthew Karr — Petitioner
Jason Matthew Karr — Petitioner