Jason Matthew Karr v. Colorado
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
whether-the-colorado-supreme-court-held-the-petitioner-to-a-higher-standard-for-pleading-ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Colorado Supreme Court held the Petitioner to a standard for pleading deficient performance and prejudice in his claims of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, which was higher than the standard established by this Court’s holding in Strickland v. Washington? 2. Whether the Colorado Supreme Court unreasonably applied the governing principles of clearly established federal law created by this Court’s holding in Strickland v. Washington? 3. Whether the state courts decisions should be reversed and case remanded for an evidentiary hearing, and appointment of counsel in order to address the Petitioner's meritorious ineffective assistance of counsel claims? i