Whether the termination of the plaintiff's employment was unlawful due to language barriers and lack of due process

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; In the United State, there are no institution or no law to correct the illegal act by the Security : ; Clearance? : ; . This case is simply only a matter of language problem, either the Supervisor 'English is not good or Plaintiff English is not good. He fired her only did not write down China as foreign country. : The plaintiff was born in China. U.S. law stipulates that if a baby is born in the U.S, who is a . U.S. citizen. She borned in China, how can you say that China is foreign country to her? ; And she diligently worked for the DFAS more than six years, and she every year got reward and she did not do any mistake take and she has two degrees. and she is a recognized permanent employee. After he fired her than tell her that he do not fire her ask her to quit her job by her self, she did not quit her job, becouse she did not do any thing wrong. Plaintiff love America and she believes that America will give her the reasonable judgment in her case. God Bless America. a . LIST OF PARITIES (_ ) All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. (_ ) All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all partied to the proceeding in the court whose judgment is the subject of this petition is as follows: . Petitioner Jiping Rizk Respondent Defense of Finance and Accounting Servise . Rizk V DFAS: No U.S District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Columbus) Judgment entered November 10, 2016 . . Rizk V DFAS: No US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (Columbus) Judgment entered June 11,2018 ‘ Rizk V DFAS: No 19-1110 United States Court of Appeals ; Judgment entered November 13, 2019 RELATED CASES ;