No. 20-5172
Darrell Henry Williams v. Joe Coakley, Warden
IFP
Tags: career-offender criminal-statutes due-process federal-procedure mandatory-minimums physical-force reckless-conduct sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy
HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether reckless-conduct-resulting-in-injury satisfies the 'use-of-physical-force' element of the career-offender-sentencing-guideline
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Do criminal statutes satisfied by reckless conduct resulting in injury require as an element “the use . . . of physical force against the person of another’ within the definition of the mandatory career offender Sentencing Guideline U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(1)? ; 2. Whether “the remedy by motion” authorized by 28 U.S.C. §2255(h)(2) is rendered “inadequate or ineffective” under §2255(e) when a federal appellate court makes the primary criterion for authorizing a second §2255 petition the federal prosecutor's consent to it? 2
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-24
Reply of petitioner Darrell Henry Williams filed. (Distributed)
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-10-23
Brief of respondent Coakley, Warden in opposition filed.
2020-09-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 23, 2020.
2020-09-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 23, 2020 to October 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-08-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 23, 2020.
2020-08-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 24, 2020 to September 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-07-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 24, 2020)
Attorneys
Coakley, Warden
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent