Whether the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals have jurisdiction to hear a certificate of appealability

No question identified. : Ld... Questoas. _Fesentea_ for. Review. _.._ _. Does. 924 Ke)? “Serious. Drog..chense" eo 2. Ww a both ___. Statutes___whea_ . Seatencding. ——-fovlal__ hypothe hal __aqa caveting.—_ _ ts oteacing__fa Ctors. __be _ComSideered when clederentag the "ma xian. AECM. en > aeeeT Se) pasonment. ee __diboes Eighth _circuit__court Appeals have jy sclichon_ to_heac_a_cechfic -___.___|cate.of _AppealabilAy.—. ce wt SHof Paches _ Relatedi_ecases. Table of Content : opinions belo . Uris atiction Constttional and sthtery provisions . stalement of the Case Reasons for granting the wnt : Conclusion Zrdex to ANpenaices Appenak fl Rehearing clenec! AdK Bb ~ judqrent Eighth Cireurtax C Dist ct. Roles | jurisstichion pee x D>~ Dist ctepinton leopenc M E-order granhng eenhin of tare fo Ble free f sohe cL appeal was Filed. timely Table of Avthorites ciled paye. caseS . O-S. Vv. Ha hwarcer, ©3> £30 BB 12,14 (US. Ve. Siamons , e449 £353 237 1 le os. Ve Newhatd, 141 faa dss 10 Me US Ve Rockymore ,AG Fda IF 6 9 US. Ve Broks , As! #34 120 14, 19 Carachuri-Rsendo, SLO US Sez 2,14 Reddiquez , 53> US. 37> IM, 14,20 jeflerson , 622 fiad. 49> 3 mion. V. Shattecl(, 404 Ow 2d tl 8,410 Mian. V. Best 449 Qw2el 42> 4,11 Blakely Vv. washingha, SUZ US. 75 ul, us. Vv. Valdovinows, Heo Lisa O2+ + vs Ve Lockett , 782 £38 Bsz 1A, statutes and RAYS IO vse Fade) 18 USC 922 @) 26 OSC. i254 YU) Minn, St. 192.024 22) ee —___]|Sup reme_Couct_of the_onited Sisfes Petit ope wot of cectiocani___— wed of cect the Op ininan spel : n€_Cpintom—ob_the — _A_toe the _peditiog Couch Ht e__pedtiog ; (a . i the date on which the United siales Court of Appeals decided my case las Apo! 3, 2020 . Aerely pettion Ry rehearing was denied by the Uniled sfales Court of lepeals on the folloosing alate: May 7M | 2026 , AAW a Copy of +he order denying cehearing appeacS at Appenclix A : | e gor Sali ction of this Court ts invoked Under ZB .S.C. © pzs4 ci) 2 } | —— Hse _. Houctten+th Amendweat 4p be clepdved dof his ibech © dedecmumedl by the trier of fact ibs Stabby | eciovS _dlaxg_ublease in _relevact _ pact, as__“an_cflense understate lars, _Hiqvoluing_. ols tution of 2 cootoited __l&p Sub saace..w, de _Which_3_ Maxum _He cm—_of _impa'Sorment of _4eo_yeacs_. b4 la Statement of th €_CaSeo col. quilt y—to__couct_|_of the iokicwation _—_ filed_oa_ une_2.,20le.. Oo agi, Zole, —_| { Cmof __| BO. maths imipasoameat sth ean berqj-a—feloa_i A PeSSkSSioo of A ——| WRATH! p—violation__of IS OS.c. —_|f 226 \J The_Couct aaleptecl the —_|preseatta Ce cepoct aad Rust — Me —_enhaaced__pena isi 25__pursuant te —__|Acmecl_caceer criminal Ast ioubi 2 Nhinedt__i Qu IBUS.C IAM Ve) en _ ReaSons_ Bc. Graating..the_ fettioa_ ee a — whether 924 (e)_ S€eiovs_Drog. offense -_ ~~. approach... ne aL Also, it. iste. conflict with . lotheappellate Ccoucts__oa_+his—__ ; issue. _.-_ JPehtivoers. __ state. charge. was. imtproz_ ae peclys determined tobe a SeriosS ee olrug_oflease... nnn — — Yyeac__Maacaioc minimum _Seateace_. _ Jeo! aw filly poSSeSSES___a _fireacm ae & Ane). ChonS_ by aay feloay . br. a __ _ IID os.c. 924.e)___ Rtloner_ was _ eateaced__to the fifleen_ years io P act, because __his_previous__may FI" _ sofo_Sfate—_ . court fr furth dleyree dieucy poss. . —.. ffz]s] except manjvana with intent . to sell was “ improper lj” celerminec! _ be a Serious clog oflense” _ Pehtivner now Challenges whether . his por minnesota Conviction qual; . hes as a SeriorS drug cffense. . . Federal Jad defines a “ a i035 chug ofense “, in relevagt . part, as an oflesse under State laXr , . ; involving ... aistribbtion ...CoFf J a controlled , SUbHance... Ly aohich a marine term of Loe Imprisonment of 4en Years of more is. _ . prescribed by law "> VS.C-F2UOQDe') . ; Petitioner challenges whether courts ~ re able to vse — hypothetical sentencing Jwhen determing whether A is a Maxitom term of imprsenment of tr JYEArs of more preScribed hy Jao fo the maximum ferme OF iImpmsonmest .