No. 20-5541

Betsy Sachs v. Bank of America, N.A.

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-31
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: arbitration attorney-conduct civil-rights debt-collection due-process fdcpa foreclosure judicial-procedure manifest-disregard
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-01-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the definition of a 'debt collector' under the FDCPA includes attorneys who select non-judicial foreclosure

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : oe QvESTIGiWS PRESENTED QOiwHerHeR THE DEFINITION 4 DE / Br COLLECTOR UNDE tHE Foca trvclLuDes AoRWEYS WHo sSefecT NOM= ‘ JuDIClAL Foreclosure AS THERE /S A SHARP SPLIT IN C/acviTs FOR DEBTORS AeovMED T3y Conéress 1V 997 BiHerHer THE COURT W/llL RESOLNE THE CONTINUED Vrrw~elTy Of THE MAMIFEST DISREGARD DOCTRINE, CASE 19-1792 PRESENTE A SORT OF CRAVE CONTINGENCY FHAT WjoULD TUSTIfY RECALL OF A MAMDATE BwKeryer WOV-TUDicli ac ForeCloSure Is Prorerv Char acrerizéD AS DEBT COLLECTION 4) WHETHER A moKTeEnce /f Creme BECHLSE L7 LS A AouSt AVD VCT Ayorvey Ar crake AWD WHETHER TRYING Jo FORECLOSE (ounTs As CoLletivG 4A DERT OGrouerwen A Bank's misTHkes AD Lack of Du€ DILLERV CE CAUSES People TO FACE LIRDWE FUL FORECLOSURE |

Docket Entries

2021-01-11
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-11-04
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 30, 2020)

Attorneys

Betsy Sachs
Betsy Sachs — Petitioner
Betsy Sachs — Petitioner