No. 20-5546
Rudolph Carryl v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure fraud fraud-definition sale sale-requirement sec-v-zandford securities-exchange-act securities-exchange-act-of-1934 securities-fraud standing statutory-interpretation zandford-precedent
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-10-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether violation of §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 has been extended to encompass acts where the fraud does not coincide with a sale
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW A. WHETHER VIOLATION OF §10(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78j(b)) AND THE HOLDING OF SEC v. Zandford, 535 U.S. 813 (2002) HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO ENCOMPASS ACTS WHERE THE FRAUD DOES NOT COINCIDE WITH A SALE 1
Docket Entries
2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 30, 2020)
Attorneys
Rudolph Carryl
Samuel Bayness Winthrop — Winthrop & Gaines Messick, PLLC, Petitioner
Samuel Bayness Winthrop — Winthrop & Gaines Messick, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent