No. 20-5575
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals-court civil-procedure clear-and-convincing-standard due-process standard-of-proof successive-proceedings
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2020-10-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an appeals court has discretion to implement a clear and convincing standard of proof in a second or successive proceeding
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | Whether an appeals Court has digcvel®,, ho : q { + NY \ nd oOo oO a mplement @ Clear an convincing, standeawd oO of proof in a second or success ve proceed ting 2 Gof (A |
Docket Entries
2020-10-13
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-08-21
Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 2, 2020)
Attorneys
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Van Lawson Williams
Van Lawson Williams — Petitioner