clear-and-convincing-standard
3 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-1795 | Gregory Melvin Haynes v. State Bar of California | California | 2021-06-24 | Denied | Response Waived | attorney-discipline california-supreme-court clear-and-convincing-standard due-process reciprocal-discipline selling-v-radford summary-judgment | Does the California Reciprocal attorney discipline statute—Business and profession code 6049.1 — violate the standard set forth in Selling v Radford, … |
| 20-5575 | In Re Van Lawson Williams | 2020-09-02 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | appeals-court civil-procedure clear-and-convincing-standard due-process standard-of-proof successive-proceedings | Whether an appeals court has discretion to implement a clear and convincing standard of proof in a second or successive proceeding | |
| 19-1073 | Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2020-03-02 | Denied | Response Waived | 35-usc-112 35-usc-282 clear-and-convincing-standard enablement inoperability non-enabled-claims patent-law patent-validity presumption-of-validity statutory-interpretation unpredictability | Whether patent claims that cover a class may be invalidated as non-enabled under 35 U.S.C. § 112 based on a finding of high unpredictability in the ar… |