35-usc-282
4 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20-1291 | WPEM, LLC v. SOTI Inc. | Federal Circuit | 2021-03-17 | Denied | 35-usc-282 35-usc-285 clear-and-convincing-evidence district-court-discretion exceptional-case patent-law patent-validity prior-art | 1. Does a patent's presumption of validity afforded by 35 U.S.C. §282 limit a district court's discretion to find a case exceptional under 35 U.S.C. §… | |
| 20-1165 | Lakshmi Arunachalam v. Citigroup, Inc., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2021-02-24 | Denied | 35-usc-282 access-to-courts collateral-estoppel constitutional-rights due-process patent-law separation-of-powers supreme-court-precedent | 1. Whether the inferior courts arbitrarily claiming collateral estoppel without once proving it applying Supreme Court precedent dating back more t… | |
| 20-440 | Minerva Surgical, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2020-10-06 | Judgment Issued | Amici (12)Relisted (2) | 35-usc-282 assignor-estoppel due-process judicial-doctrine patent patent-infringement patent-invalidity patent-law statutory-interpretation | In the Patent Act, Congress established that invalidity is a "defense[] in any action involving the validity or infringement of a patent." 35 U.S.C. §… |
| 19-1073 | Enzo Life Sciences, Inc. v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2020-03-02 | Denied | Response Waived | 35-usc-112 35-usc-282 clear-and-convincing-standard enablement inoperability non-enabled-claims patent-law patent-validity presumption-of-validity statutory-interpretation unpredictability | I. In light of a patent's presumption of validity under 35 U.S.C. § 282 and the concomitant clear and convincing standard for proving invalidity, may … |