No. 20-5672
David Kareem Turpin v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924c3a crime-of-violence criminal-law federal-courts force-clause hobbs-act sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation violent-crime
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Hobbs Act robbery, which can be committed by putting another in fear of future injury to himself, his property, or even his intangible property, is a crime of violence that necessarily requires violent force under the force clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED ; Whether Hobbs Act robbery, which can be committed by putting another in fear of future injury to himself, his property, or even his intangible property, is a crime of violence that necessarily requires violent force under the force clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A). i LIST OF ALL DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2020-12-16
Reply of petitioner David Turpin filed.
2020-12-03
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2020-10-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 3, 2020.
2020-10-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 2, 2020 to December 3, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-10-02
Response Requested. (Due November 2, 2020)
2020-09-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.
2020-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 13, 2020)
Attorneys
David Turpin
Jaclyn Lee Tarlton — Assistant Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Jaclyn Lee Tarlton — Assistant Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent