No. 20-5912
Adam Alan Henry v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-2256 constitutional-vagueness criminal-law due-process federal-statute first-amendment overbreadth sexually-explicit-conduct statutory-interpretation vagueness
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-11-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the definition of 'sexually explicit conduct' in 18 U.S.C. § 2256(2)(A)(v) is vague, ambiguous, overbroad and a violation of due process
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether in 18 U.S.C. § 2256(2)(A)(v) the definition of “sexually explicit conduct” defined as the lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person is vague, ambiguous, overbroad and a violation of due process. i
Docket Entries
2020-11-09
Petition DENIED.
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-05
Motion (20M17) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal Granted.
2020-08-19
MOTION (20M17) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-06
Motion (20M17) for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
2020-07-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2020)
Attorneys
Adam Alan Henry
Anthony Patrick Capozzi — Law Offices of Anthony P. Capozzi, Petitioner
Anthony Patrick Capozzi — Law Offices of Anthony P. Capozzi, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent