No. 20-5917
Eric Malmstrom v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure competency criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process embassy-communication judicial-discretion mental-competency mental-disease mental-disease-or-defect standing sua-sponte
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-01-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court abused its discretion when it failed to sua sponte order a competency evaluation
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2021-01-25
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2020-12-18
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2020-11-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 18, 2020.
2020-11-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 25, 2020 to December 18, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-10-26
Response Requested. (Due November 25, 2020)
2020-10-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2020.
2020-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-10-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 5, 2020)
Attorneys
Eric Malmstrom
Jane Elizabeth Lee — Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent