Conference: 2021-01-22
107 cases — 0 granted, 107 denied/dismissed, 0 pending
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19-1039 | PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. New Jersey, et al. | Third Circuit | Judgment Issued | CVSGAmici (21)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) | certificate-of-public-convenience constitutional-law eminent-domain federal-power ferc interstate-pipeline natural-gas-act state-property | Whether the NGA delegates to FERC certificate holders the authority to exercise the federal government's eminent domain power to condemn land in which… | 55.5 |
| 20-257 | Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., et al. v. Maxcimo Scott, et al. | Second Circuit | Dismissed | Amici (4)Relisted (5) | civil-procedure class-certification collective-action district-court employment-law fair-labor-standards-act material-question opt-in-plaintiffs similarly-situated | Whether a district court may consider factors other than the presence of a single material question of law or fact common to a group of employees when… | 16.5 |
| 20-746 | South Bay United Pentecostal Church, et al. v. Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, et al. | Ninth Circuit | GVR | Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse Waived | civil-rights constitutional-review first-amendment free-exercise free-speech jacobson-v-massachusetts pandemic-restrictions religious-liberty strict-scrutiny | Once again, Petitioners South Bay United Pentecostal Church and Bishop Arthur Hodges III ("South Bay") must seek relief from this Court. California, i… | 15.5 |
| 20-330 | Donald J. Trump, President of the United States v. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, et al. | Second Circuit | GVR | Amici (4)Relisted (2) | article-iii constitutional-interpretation domestic-emoluments-clause emoluments-clause foreign-emoluments-clause judicial-review presidential-immunity presidential-powers standing | Whether plaintiffs who claim to compete with businesses in which the President of the United States has a financial interest can seek redress in an Ar… | 15.0 |
| 19-1126 | Stacey Mooney v. Illinois Education Association, et al. | Seventh Circuit | Denied | Relisted (9) | 42-usc-1983 civil-rights civil-rights-42-usc-1983 constitutional-rights good-faith-defense private-entities qualified-immunity restitution restitutionary-remedies retroactivity section-1983 takings | Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018), held that the Constitution forbids public-… | 14.5 |
| 19-1130 | Dale Danielson, et al. v. Jay Inslee, Governor of Washington, et al. | Ninth Circuit | Denied | Relisted (9) | 42-usc-1983 civil-rights civil-rights-42-usc-1983 constitutional-rights court-ruling good-faith-defense private-entities qualified-immunity restitution retroactivity takings | In Wyatt v. Cole, 504 U.S. 158 (1992), this Court held that qualified immunity is categorically unavailable to private entities who violate 42 U.S.C. … | 14.5 |
| 20-422 | Sarah R. Lee v. Ohio Education Association, et al. | Sixth Circuit | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) | 42-usc-1983 civil-rights constitutional-rights good-faith-defense private-entities qualified-immunity restitution restitutionary-remedies retroactivity section-1983 | Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018), held that the Constitution forbids public-… | 14.5 |
| 20-208 | Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Ethan Volungis, et al. | Ninth Circuit | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | amendment civil-procedure district-court federal-rules-of-civil-procedure leave-to-amend motion-to-dismiss represented-plaintiff rule-15 sua-sponte | When Liberty Mutual moved to dismiss Ethan Volungis's complaint alleging bad-faith handling of an insurance claim, Volungis and his counsel chose not … | 14.0 |
| 20-331 | Donald J. Trump, President of the United States v. District of Columbia, et al. | Fourth Circuit | GVR | Amici (2)Relisted (2) | abuse-of-discretion district-court domestic-emoluments emoluments-clause foreign-emoluments interlocutory-appeal legal-error mandamus motion-to-dismiss presidential-immunity | 1. Whether a writ of mandamus is appropriate because, contrary to the holding of the court of appeals, the district court's denial of the President's … | 13.0 |
| 20-82 | Kane County, Utah, et al. v. United States, et al. | Tenth Circuit | Denied | Relisted (5) | administrative-representation civil-procedure environmental-interest federal-civil-procedure federal-government intervention intervention-as-of-right quiet-title quiet-title-action special-interest-groups standing tenth-circuit-precedent | This petition addresses whether private special interest groups have an interest to intervene as of right in a quiet title action brought by a State a… | 12.5 |
| 20-96 | United States v. Kane County, Utah, et al. | Tenth Circuit | Denied | Relisted (5) | circuit-conflict civil-procedure environmental-advocacy environmental-concerns federal-rules federal-rules-of-civil-procedure intervention intervention-of-right quiet-title quiet-title-action standing | Whether an advocacy organization's environmental concerns qualify as an "interest" required by Rule 24(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure f… | 12.5 |
| 20-482 | Herbert H. Slatery III, Attorney General of Tennessee, et al. v. Adams & Boyle, P.C., et al. | Sixth Circuit | GVR | Amici (1)Relisted (2) | abortion abortion-rights constitutional-challenge covid-19 covid-19-order executive-order medical-procedures mootness munsingwear-doctrine standing | Whether, pursuant to United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950), this Court should vacate the Sixth Circuit's judgment and remand with ins… | 12.0 |
| 20-639 | Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Steve Sisolak, Governor of Nevada, et al. | Ninth Circuit | Denied | Amici (6)Relisted (2) | covid-19 covid-19-restrictions equal-protection first-amendment free-assembly free-exercise free-exercise-clause free-speech religious-liberty strict-scrutiny | 1. Whether the Governor's favoring of secular over religious gatherings violates the Free Exercise Clause. 2. Whether the Governor's favoring of secu… | 12.0 |
| 20-20 | Benito Casanova v. International Association of Machinists, Local 701 | Seventh Circuit | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (7) | 42-usc-1983 civil-rights color-of-law constitutional-rights damages-liability good-faith-defense legal-immunity | Is there a "good faith defense" to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that shields a defendant from damages liability for depriving citizens of their constitutional rig… | 11.5 |
| 20-695 | Derek Piersing v. Domino’s Pizza Franchising LLC, et al. | Sixth Circuit | Denied | Amici (1) | aaa-rules arbitrability circuit-court delegation-doctrine employment-agreement first-options procedural-rules state-court | There must be "clear and unmistakable evidence" of parties' intent to have arbitrability decided by an arbitrator for a court to find that they agreed… | 11.5 |
| 20-60 | Sheldon Silver v. United States, et al. | Second Circuit | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (6) | appeals-court bribery criminal-law due-process extortion harmless-error hobbs-act public-official | (1) Can a public official be convicted of bribery absent proof of an agreed exchange with the alleged bribe payor, based solely on his unexpressed, un… | 11.0 |
| 19-1104 | Mark Janus v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al. | Seventh Circuit | Denied | Amici (1)Relisted (9) | 42-usc-1983 civil-rights color-of-law constitutional-rights damages-liability good-faith-defense legal-immunity unconstitutional-law | Is there a "good faith defense" to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that shields a defendant from damages liability for depriving citizens of their constitutional rig… | 10.5 |
| 20-604 | InfoBionic, Inc. v. Cardionet, LLC, et al. | Federal Circuit | Denied | 35-usc-101 abstract-idea federal-circuit innovation longstanding-human-practice patent-eligibility patent-monopoly statutory-interpretation | Whether the Federal Circuit has properly narrowed the scope of the abstract idea exception under 35 U.S.C. § 101. | 10.5 | |
| 20-865 | In Re Todd Britton-Harr | Denied | 28-usc-2244 28-usc-2255 circuit-split false-statement federal-prisoners habeas-corpus section-2244 section-2255 successive-petitions supervised-release | Whether 28 U.S.C. section 2244(b)(1) ("[a] claim presented in a second or successive habeas corpus application under section 2254 that was presented i… | 10.5 | ||
| 20-486 | Nathaniel Ogle v. Ohio Civil Service Employees Association, AFSCME Local 11, AFL-CIO | Sixth Circuit | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (3) | 42-usc-1983 civil-rights color-of-law constitutional-rights damages-liability good-faith-defense legal-immunity | Is there a "good faith defense" to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that shields a defendant from damages liability for depriving citizens of their constitutional rig… | 9.5 |
| 20-245 | Patricia Nelson v. Esteban Rivera | Sixth Circuit | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | civil-rights excessive-force eyewitness-testimony qualified-immunity summary-judgment tolan-v-cotton | Whether the Sixth Circuit erred when it conspicuously disregarded the standard set forth in Tolan v. Cotton, 572 U.S. 650 (2014) by granting qualified… | 9.0 |
| 20-305 | Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, et al. v. Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas, et al. | Fifth Circuit | GVR | Amici (1)Relisted (3) | abortion abortion-rights constitutional-rights covid-19 due-process executive-order judicial-review mandamus mootness | The Governor of Texas, in reliance on the COVID 19 pandemic, issued an executive order that banned nearly all abortions in Texas for at least a month,… | 7.5 |
| 20-678 | M&T Bank Corporation, et al. v. David Jaroslawicz, et al. | Third Circuit | Denied | Amici (2) | compliance corporate-governance disclosure disclosure-obligations materiality public-company regulatory-compliance risk-factors sec-regulation securities-disclosure securities-regulation | (1) Whether Item 105 of Regulation S-K, which obligates public companies to discuss material risk factors in registration statements, periodic SEC fil… | 7.5 |
| 20-183 | Billy D. Stair, III v. Charles Jackson | Eighth Circuit | Denied | excessive-force fourth-amendment graham-v-connor law-enforcement plumhoff-v-rickard qualified-immunity reasonableness-standard totality-of-the-circumstances use-of-force | Did the Eighth Circuit depart from this Court's decisions in Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) and Plumhoff v. Rickard, 572 U.S. 765 (2014) in den… | 5.5 | |
| 20-691 | Lih Bin Shih v. Nathan Brooks Parnell | California | Denied | civil-rights clean-hands-doctrine due-process fifth-amendment first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech government-petition petition-clause police-reports retaliation | 1. Whether the Court may deny Petitioner's First Amendment right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances? In particular when the Govern… | 5.5 | |
| 20-696 | Peter Brownstein v. Tina Lindsay, et al. | Third Circuit | Denied | assignment-of-copyright co-authors copyright-act copyright-assignment copyright-law derivative-work exclusive-rights joint-work license-revenue statutory-ownership | Once a joint work is fixed, are the rights of the co-authors as the statutory co-owners of the copyrights in that work severable such that a co-author… | 5.5 | |
| 20-700 | Addie Smith v. Syhadley, LLC | Washington | Denied | arbitration-agreement arbitration-agreements civil-procedure federal-arbitration-act motion-to-compel preemption state-law state-law-conflict supersedeas supreme-clause | 1. Whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts state Supersedeas law? Does this state law conflict with the FAA? 2. Whether the Federal Arbitration … | 5.5 | |
| 20-702 | David Stiles, Jr. v. Texas | Texas | Denied | arrest-to-trial-delay barker-v-wingo constitutional-rights doggett-v-united-states due-process government-burden presumption-of-prejudice presumptive-prejudice sixth-amendment speedy-trial | This Court held in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) that a speedy trial analysis is triggered by a delay of eight months. This Court held in Dogge… | 5.5 | |
| 20-704 | Cesar Santana v. California | California | Denied | age-appropriate-sentencing civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process habeas-corpus juvenile-sentencing liberty-interest miller-v-alabama sentencing youth-offender | 1. Does California Create a Liberty Interest to "Youthful-Offender's" when it Enacted Legislation in Response/Remedy of a United States Supreme Court… | 5.5 | |
| 20-706 | Stone Creek, Inc. v. Omnia Italian Design, Inc. | Ninth Circuit | Denied | circuit-court-precedent circuit-split disgorgement disgorgement-of-profits intellectual-property intentional-misconduct judicial-precedent mishawaka-rubber trademark-infringement unjust-enrichment willfulness | Does the Ninth Circuit's refusal to disgorge profits in this case of intentional infringement involving the identical mark on identical products confl… | 5.5 | |
| 20-735 | Artem Koshkalda v. Seiko Epson Corporation, et al. | Ninth Circuit | Denied | civil-procedure dismissal district-court-procedure federal-rules-civil-procedure frcp-rule-25 frcp-rule-41 rule-25 rule-41 standing substitution-of-parties voluntary-dismissal | Did The United States District Court Central District of California err in denying Plaintiffs Motion To Set Aside a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal File… | 5.5 | |
| 20M47 | Sedfrey M. Linsangan v. Alice M. Taijeron, et al. | Ninth Circuit | Denied | None | 5.5 | ||
| 20M48 | Shane Jermaine Matthews v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | Fifth Circuit | Denied | None | 5.5 | ||
| 20M49 | Waymon Jenkins v. Florida Department of Corrections | Eleventh Circuit | Denied | None | 5.5 | ||
| 20-278 | Marguerite Smith v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, et al. | Eleventh Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2) | 11th-circuit appellate-procedure circuit-rules civil-procedure due-process federal-rules federal-rules-of-appellate-procedure judicial-discretion jurisdiction mandate-issuance standing | Does the 11th Circuit's circuit rules supersede the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedures, particularly when it results in depriving an individual due… | 4.0 |
| 20-497 | Jamal A. Azeez v. West Virginia | West Virginia | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2) | actual-innocence civil-rights constitutional-rights ex-post-facto false-arrest jury-selection megan-laws perjury prosecutorial-misconduct racial-discrimination | 1. Did the lower court condone systemic injustice against Petitioner ("Azeez "), a colored citizen, knowing that he was falsely arrested and indicted… | 4.0 |
| 20-580 | Barry Damon Mallatere v. Town of Boone, North Carolina | Fourth Circuit | Denied | Response Waived | 42-usc-1983 ashcroft-v-iqbal civil-rights fourth-amendment malicious-prosecution monell-v-dept-of-soc-servs municipal-liability policymaker-liability | The Fourth Circuit affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded the district court's dismissal over the Petitioner's, Barry Damon Mallatre, causes … | 3.5 |
| 20-591 | Daniel Greer, Rabbi, et al. v. Eliyahu Mirlis | Second Circuit | Denied | Response Waived | adverse-inference civil-procedure civil-rights due-process evidentiary-inference fifth-amendment privilege self-incrimination | 1. What factors determine whether an adverse inference may be drawn against a party to a civil action following the party's invocation of the Fifth Am… | 3.5 |
| 20-738 | Donald Grochowski, as Administrator of the Estate of Kenneth Grochowski, Deceased, et al. v. Clayton County, Georgia, et al. | Eleventh Circuit | Denied | Response Waived | cell-design civil-rights detainee-safety due-process inadequate-staffing jail-conditions legislative-immunity objective-reasonableness qualified-immunity substantial-risk | Jail supervisor policymakers and Clayton County, Georgia were sued by detainee Grochowski's representatives for the known conditions and systems they … | 3.5 |
| 20-742 | Steven Bruce v. Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. | Ninth Circuit | Denied | Response Waived | administrative-law due-process false-and-misleading fifth-amendment medically-acceptable-indications medicare-part-d ninth-circuit rehabilitation-act rehabilitation-act-section-504 | This is Compendia case, a case of first impression under Shalala v. Illinois Council, 529 U.S. 1 (2000). 1. Can the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Nin… | 3.5 |
| 20-744 | Michael Wigginton, Jr. v. The University of Mississippi, et al. | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response Waived | 42-usc-1983 circuit-split civil-rights clearly-established-right due-process fifth-circuit hope-v-pelzer qualified-immunity state-actors supreme-court-precedent | Whether the Fifth Circuit's grant of qualified immunity to the state actors named in the instant matter was violative of Supreme Court precedent estab… | 3.5 |
| 20-750 | Timothy P. Murphy v. Susan Stacy, Circuit Court Judge | Eleventh Circuit | Denied | Response Waived | civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process erie-doctrine federal-courts state-law-interpretation subject-matter-jurisdiction summary-judgment swift-v-tyson | 1. Whether under any circumstances in their appli cation of common law, federal courts are allowed the authority or discretion to disregard this Cou… | 3.5 |
| 20-784 | Jeffry Schmidt v. Kenneth J. Braithwaite, Secretary of the Navy | District of Columbia | Denied | Response Waived | administrative-review arbitrary-and-capricious arbitrary-capricious-standard disability-evaluation disability-ratings judicial-notice medical-evidence military-compensation military-disability new-and-material-evidence veterans-affairs veterans-disability | 1. Did Federal Circuits, including the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Refuse to Recognize that the U.S. Military and the … | 3.5 |
| 20-793 | Samir Rafic Khoury v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response Waived | appellate-review criminal-defendant criminal-procedure indictment-dismissal mandamus mandamus-relief post-indictment-delay post-judgment-review prejudice speedy-trial | Whether a Court of Appeals may review, on petition for a writ of mandamus, the denial of a criminal defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment on sp… | 3.5 |
| 20-800 | Tracy Alan Barnett v. United States | Eighth Circuit | Denied | Response Waived | 28-usc-2255 appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-claims district-court district-court-jurisdiction federal-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure final-order habeas-corpus | Are United States District Courts required to address and resolve all constitutional claims or issues raised in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to satisfy t… | 3.5 |
| 20-848 | D. A. S. v. Madison County Department of Human Resources | Alabama | Denied | Response Waived | addiction-treatment due-process federal-law federal-regulations medicaid medicaid-expansion parental-rights remote-participation | An indigent parent relocated to a State with expanded Medicaid to get addiction treatment, because his home State, which was adjudicating his parental… | 3.5 |
| 20-5762 | Will Robertson Brown v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | IFP | constitutional-review due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus judicial-precedent petition-standard retroactivity section-2255 successive-petitions unconstitutional-law | At issue is whether, when a petitioner files a second or successive § 2255 petition, jurisdiction over the § 2255 issue hinges on a showing it is "mor… | 0.5 |
| 20-5133 | Steven Baxter v. United States | Third Circuit | Denied | Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | border-search customs customs-border fourth-amendment suspicion-less-search unincorporated-territory united-states-virgin-islands warrant-requirement warrantless-search | This case presents the interplay between two competing propositions of constitutional law. The first proposition is that the United States Virgin Isla… | 0.0 |
| 20-5917 | Eric Malmstrom v. United States | First Circuit | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | civil-procedure competency criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process embassy-communication judicial-discretion mental-competency mental-disease mental-disease-or-defect standing sua-sponte | Whether the district court abused its discretion when it failed to sua sponte order a competency evaluation. The facts of Petitioner's crime, standing… | -1.0 |
| 20-6619 | Pedro Carrasco, Jr., aka Pedro Carrasco v. United States | Ninth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | appellate-rights criminal-procedure dispositive-pretrial-motion effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement plea-bargaining pretrial-motion right-to-appeal sixth-amendment | Is a criminal defendant deprived effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment when counsel knowingly withholds from the trial … | -1.0 |
| 20-6554 | Jeffrey Fay Pike v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial impartial-jury jury-anonymity jury-selection presumption-of-innocence sixth-amendment | (1) whether cloaking jurors in anonymity impermissibly impairs the presumption of innocence and the right of the accused to an impartial jury and (2) … | -1.5 |
| 20-6559 | Jesus Villarreal-Ramirez v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | burden-of-proof criminal-procedure indictment jury-determination jury-trial prior-conviction sentencing statutory-maximum | I. Whether all facts —including the fact of a prior conviction —that increase a defendant's statutory maximum must be pleaded in the indictment and ei… | -1.5 |
| 20-6566 | Anilou Beltran Del Rio v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | constitutional-law criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process fifth-amendment sentencing sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation supervised-release | Whether 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g) comports with the Fifth and Sixth Amendments? | -1.5 |
| 20-6584 | Richard Olive v. United States | Sixth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance plea-bargaining prejudice right-to-counsel sixth-amendment strickland-v-washington | 1. What do Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012), and Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S. 156 (2012), require of a defendant to demonstrate prejudice resulting… | -1.5 |
| 20-6588 | Kenneth Scott Gordon v. United States | Ninth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | adversarial-testing appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability criminal-defense effective-assistance-of-counsel fourth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel meaningful-adversarial-testing prosecutions-case sixth-amendment | Should a certificate of appealability issue because reasonabl e jurists would debate whether a criminal defendant was deprived of the effective assist… | -1.5 |
| 20-6609 | Salvador Moreno Cervantes v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | case-law constitutional-law criminal-law due-process fifth-circuit judicial-precedent precedent sentencing statutory-interpretation supreme-court supreme-court-review writ-of-certiorari | Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)? | -1.5 |
| 20-6641 | Jose Angel Hernandez v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | commerce-clause constitutional-challenge constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-statute due-process federal-law interstate-commerce statutory-interpretation | I. Whether this Court should grant certiorari to determine whether 18 U.S.C. § 924(a) is unconstitutional by exceeding the scope of the commerce claus… | -1.5 |
| 20-6656 | Jose Armando Bazan v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | criminal-procedure davis-v-united-states fifth-circuit plain-error role-adjustment sentencing | Whether the Fifth Circuit properly applied the plain error standard of review in determining that petitioner failed to establish plain error regarding… | -1.5 |
| 20-6657 | Ezer Rosembel Barrientos-Osorio v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | constitutes plain error affecting substantial rig for a defendant likely to be deported criminal-procedure deportation plain-error sentencing-guidelines substantial-rights supervised-release | Where a district court commits plain error by failing to follow Section 5D1.1(c) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines by imposing, without expla… | -1.5 |
| 19-8006 | John P. Greiner v. Macomb County, Michigan, et al. | Sixth Circuit | Denied | Relisted (3)IFP | administrative-hearing administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech labor-relations obstruction-of-justice perjury retaliation wrongful-termination | I am a wrongfully terminated employee. I was terminated in violation of the first amendment of the United States Constitution. The pretext that was cr… | -3.5 |
| 20-5027 | Christopher Allred v. Jeffrey A. Uttecht, Warden | Ninth Circuit | Denied | Relisted (2)IFP | civil-rights due-process preemption privileges-and-immunities supremacy-clause vagueness | Is it tre that, "All pusons born or naturalized in the United states, and of the state wherein thay reside? And if so... And, becanse of t Supremacy … | -4.0 |
| 20-5733 | Clinton Lee Rumley v. United States | Fourth Circuit | Denied | IFP | almendarez-torres armed-career-criminal-act circuit-split fourth-circuit-split mens-rea omission-liability recklessness sentencing-enhancement violent-felony | (1) Whether a criminal statute that prohibits the intentional causation of bodily injury to another "by any means," including omissions, is categorica… | -4.5 |
| 20-5748 | Dacarius Holliday v. Louisiana | Louisiana | Denied | IFP | constitutional-error criminal-intent criminal-negligence due-process eighth-amendment jury-instructions jury-sentencing specific-intent standard-of-proof trial-court | 1. Can convictions for crimes requiring specific intent create constitutional error where the trial court has ruled that the evidence supports crimina… | -4.5 |
| 20-6094 | Sean Alonzo Bush v. Florida | Florida | Denied | IFP | constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency florida-supreme-court legal-precedent precedent standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence | WHETHER THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT DENIED THE PETITIONER DUE PROCESS WHEN IT ABANDONED A CENTURY OF PRECEDENT AND APPLIED A NEW AND LESS STRICT STANDAR… | -4.5 |
| 20-6371 | Antoine Moseley v. Daniel Clarke | Seventh Circuit | Denied | IFP | 14th-amendment 5th-amendment double-jeopardy double-jeopardy-clause due-process fact-finding fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment insufficient-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct statutory-elements | Whether there were post-acquittal fact-finding proceedings going to guilt or innocence of count 3 and count 4 that shared identical statutory elements… | -4.5 |
| 20-6379 | Brenda L. White v. St. Lawrence Catholic Schools | Seventh Circuit | Denied | IFP | abuse administrative-liability assault civil-rights due-process educational-abuse parental-reporting retaliation school-misconduct student-rights | Should teachers be allowed to hurt students? Should principals be allowed to lie on students? Should a parent have rights to report wrongdoing witne… | -4.5 |
| 20-6384 | Owen McCants v. Steven Silva | First Circuit | Denied | IFP | abuse-of-discretion appeals criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency federal-law-violation ineffective-counsel judicial-discretion judicial-review pretrial-procedure prosecutorial-misconduct standard-of-review | #1 : WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT, APPEALS COURT, AND SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT ABUSED THEIR DISCRETION? #2: WHETHER THE EXCLUSION OF THE DEFENDANT FROM TH… | -4.5 |
| 20-6391 | Timothy Ronald Hare v. Michigan | Michigan | Denied | IFP | constitutional-standard critical-stage effective-assistance ineffective-assistance lafler-v-cooper plea-bargaining prejudice prejudice-analysis right-to-counsel sixth-amendment united-states-v-cronic | I. Does the requirement to prove prejudice under this Court's previous decision in Latter v Cooper, place a burden on the accused that this Court deem… | -4.5 |
| 20-6396 | Michael John Bever v. Oklahoma | Oklahoma | Denied | IFP | consecutive-sentences criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment eighth-amendment eighth-amendment-review jury-finding juvenile-offender juvenile-sentencing sentencing sixth-amendment | 1. Whether a judge's decision to sentence a juvenile offender to consecutive terms is exempt from Eighth Amendment review. 2. Whether a judge's decis… | -4.5 |
| 20-6398 | Richard Wesley Allen v. Marcus A. Pollard, Warden | Ninth Circuit | Denied | IFP | civil-rights due-process equal-protection First-Amendment Fourteenth-Amendment free-speech parole prisoner-rights religious-freedom | DOES IT VIOLATE THE FIRST AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, WHEN A STATE THAT OFFERS PAROLE TO PRISONERS, DENIES PAROLE TO A PRISONE… | -4.5 |
| 20-6410 | Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, et al. | California | Denied | IFP | civil-rights conspiracy due-process judicial-misconduct legal-conspiracy mental-competency money-laundering national-security power-of-attorney standing | 1) whether this court should continue to allow lower courts to be used by international drug cartels, pedophiles, sex and human traffickers and MS 13 … | -4.5 |
| 20-6411 | Miguel A. Ramirez v. California | California | Denied | IFP | civil-rights criminal-conviction criminal-procedure cumulative-error defendant-rights due-process evidence-admissibility jury-instructions prejudicial-error sexual-abuse | 1. whetheR a juRy InstRuction in corractly Stating That Continous Sexual abuse of a child is a general intent cRime was PRejudiciael? 2. Whothek the … | -4.5 |
| 20-6416 | Devon M. Byrd v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections | Fourth Circuit | Denied | IFP | civil-procedure civil-rights due-process qualified-immunity standing takings-clause | Does Martinez v. Ryan bar procedurally defaulted substantial ineffective assistance of counsel claims under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)? Are the precedents i… | -4.5 |
| 20-6454 | Mark David Zimmerman v. Texas | Texas | Denied | IFP | 4th-amendment constitutional-law constitutional-rights fourth-amendment fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree k-9-search probable-cause reasonable-suspicion search-and-seizure traffic-stop | #I: Oid The State of Texas ard the Texas Criminal Court of Appeals, the State Court of last resort, err by affrming the lower trial Court and Judge Br… | -4.5 |
| 19-8806 | David Lawrence Dixon v. Donnie Ames, Superintendent, Mount Olive Correctional Complex | West Virginia | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | biological-evidence destruction-of-evidence due-process exculpatory-evidence fourteenth-amendment re-testing state-destruction trial | Was Appellant denied his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process when the biological evidence used in his trial was destroyed before Appellant could… | -6.0 |
| 20-5842 | Yang Mei v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore | Maryland | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | amendment-violation body-attachment city-council civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights contractor-dismissal due-process employment legal-procedure standing takings | Violations of Amendments of the Constitution In this case there are two kinds of violations to the Constitution. One is that the violations action di… | -6.0 |
| 20-6091 | Cherrie A. Hollie v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs | Federal Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP | civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection equitable-claims federal-circuit oral-argument standing veterans-claims | A. Did the Federal Circuit err in dismissing Petitioner's appeal from the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Affairs for lack of jurisdiction? B Did … | -6.0 |
| 20-6479 | Genaro Garcia v. Indiana | Indiana | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 14th-amendment civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction post-conviction-petition prosecutorial-misconduct | I. Is State Appellate Court's unexplained to allow a petitioner to file a successive petition for Post-Conviction reliet under Rule I(zz) and Post-Con… | -6.5 |
| 20-6504 | Carolyn Barnes v. United States, et al. | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | constitutional-authority delegated-authority due-process ex-post-facto fundamental-rights judicial-review motion-to-recuse recusal retaliation standard-of-review | Whether it violates due process to ignore a Motion to Recuse and apply the wrong standard of review. Whether the extended preemptive "review" or "scr… | -6.5 |
| 20-6520 | Paul Viriyapanthu v. State Bar of California, et al. | Ninth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 14th-amendment ada americans-with-disabilities-act arbitration-immunity noerr-pennington sovereign-immunity spending-clause title-ii u.s.-v.-georgia | 1. Where Congress conditioned the Americans with Disabilities Act to the states ' receipt of funding under Title IV of the Social Security Act pursuan… | -6.5 |
| 20-6553 | John F. McGinnis, Jr. v. Social Security Administration | Third Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | None | -6.5 | |
| 20-6562 | Reynaldo Salinas v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | air-force air-force-office-of-special-investigations civil-rights civilian-employee constitutional-rights due-process federal-tort-claims-act law-enforcement military-law posse-comitatus-act special-investigations standing | ft) Wqs#ns ^ ~XnVg.s4i^^4iQK\ ?_ 3,) ~X-f Milrtarij , wha-f Ar4iclg UflrtK - LLC. M.^T. uiere.'lfatij ___ fjjtiiinj- 3,) ZC-P Civilian, rtujhw ift… | -6.5 |
| 20-6575 | Ronald Jermaine Jackson v. United States | Eighth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction free-speech government-accountability indigenous-rights jurisdiction land-management standing tribal-sovereignty | . \ w kV/vle-^ c>E i \\ Af foies, \T S fw^'t'rtd-t+w ^ Tr\€, So pee V_a^ 0p La»^L ?| J5 4-V^ CbwsVA-Vi VUOA *2~' Is S\A\>W^ AcVolisW^ f>. H . (_^a A… | -6.5 |
| 20-6576 | Jessie Anthony Parker v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | None | -6.5 | |
| 20-6577 | Victor Mondragon v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | acceptance-of-responsibility appellate-review criminal-sentencing district-court downward-adjustment federal-jurisdiction panel-review standard-of-review | I. DID THE DISTRICT COURT ERR BY DENYING MR. MONDRAGON A THREE-LEVEL DOWNWARD ADJUSTMENT FOR ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY? II. DID THE PANEL ERR BY E… | -6.5 |
| 20-6580 | Joseph W. Peeples, III v. United States | Second Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | arrest civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure detention due-process evidence-admissibility fourth-amendment search-and-seizure travel warrantless-search | Does the long standing commitment on U.S. Constitution Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment to right with Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 3, 5, 5.1, 7,… | -6.5 |
| 20-6589 | John Xavier Portillo, aka John Portillo v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | criminal-procedure critical-stage initial-appearance magistrate magistrate-hearing right-to-counsel sixth-amendment | Whether the initial appearance before a Magistrate after the right to counsel has attached is a critical stage of the proceeding under the Sixth Amend… | -6.5 |
| 20-6590 | Jimmy Pike v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | appellate-review clear-error conspiracy criminal-procedure drug-conspiracy methamphetamine mitigating-role sentencing-guidelines | A district court's guidelines calculatio ns are reviewed for clear error. Did the court of appeals err in holding that the district court's guidelines… | -6.5 |
| 20-6591 | Jose Delores Vanegas v. United States | Fourth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | constitutional-rights conviction due-process fifth-amendment fourth-amendment judicial-discretion prosecutorial-misconduct remand | I WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY REFUSING TO ACCEPT THE . PETITIONER'S CLAIMS WITHOUT CONDUCTING THE PROPER SPECIFIC FACT-FINDINGS … | -6.5 |
| 20-6594 | Juan Fredy Hernandez-Zozaya v. United States | Third Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | circuit-split criminal-intent criminal-law federal-law human-trafficking interstate-commerce interstate-transportation prostitution prostitution-statute statutory-interpretation transportation-across-state-lines | WHETHER IT IS A VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. § 2421(a), WHICH MAKES IT ILLEGAL TO TRANSPORT A PERSON ACROSS STATE LINES WITH THE INTENT FOR THAT PERSON TO E… | -6.5 |
| 20-6596 | Kevin S. Abney v. United States | Sixth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | armed-career-criminal due-process legislative-history rule-of-lenity sentencing-guidelines statutory-construction statutory-interpretation | Whether the legislative history dealing with 18 USC § 924(e)(1) supports all the lower courts' rulings concerning offenses committed on different occa… | -6.5 |
| 20-6597 | John Aguilar v. Willis Chapman, Warden | Sixth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | change-of-venue constitutional-rights due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fair-trial guilt ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prior-bad-acts prosecutorial-misconduct witness-testimony | I. Is a Defendant denied the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel and ultimately a fundamentally fair trial as guaranteed by the Un… | -6.5 |
| 20-6606 | Paul W. Miller v. B. Von Blankensee | Ninth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-law due-process judicial-review procedural-due-process remedies standing statutory-interpretation | I. Can Congress Statutorily limit the Subject-matter Jurisdiction of Courts Created by Act of Congress? II. Is there a limitation of time based on pr… | -6.5 |
| 20-6618 | Marcel Malachowski v. United States | Second Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | appellate-review brady-v-united-states civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process extra-judicial-circumstances habeas-corpus impartiality ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel strickland-v-washington | Does An Appeal Brought Under 28 U.S.C. § 1455 Associated To Other Avenue Of Relief Grits When An Appellate Court Fails To Adequately Resolve Impartial… | -6.5 |
| 20-6628 | Rodane Lamb v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | conspiracy-charges criminal-procedure dea-testimony due-process evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-instructions jury-selection trial-errors | 1) Was Counsel Ineffective For Not Challenging Petitioner's Stated Cumulative Errors in Argument One? 2) Was Counsel Ineffective For Not Challenging… | -6.5 |
| 20-6630 | Alejandro S. Estrada v. Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. | Ninth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | actual-innocence administrative-law agency-decision certificate-of-appealability civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process judicial-review jurisdictional-challenge procedural-default procedural-error sentencing | Wktikar or got e latk) o courts *UM 17¢ 5ftvid ;101WA -crow iikip5114 avvi pro-i-gtkivi 4'1Q unctibiitu hand i wtpositiovi aid. ethei aloso (de. staii… | -6.5 |
| 20-6632 | Claudio Valdez v. United States | First Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection federal-jurisdiction standing | WHETHER THIS CASE PRESENTS THE COURT WITH AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS WHAT POINT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING AND UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES A DEFENDANT CAN I… | -6.5 |
| 20-6637 | David Earl Brown v. United States | Sixth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | armed-career-criminal-act attempted-burglary generic-burglary james-v-united-states sixth-circuit tennessee-aggravated-burglary | Does Tennessee's aggravated burglary statute, which defines "entry" so broadly as to encompass mere attempted burglary, qualify as a "generic burglary… | -6.5 |
| 20-6638 | Raheem Jefferson Brennerman, aka Jefferson R. Brennerman, aka Ayodeji Soetan v. United States | Second Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | abuse-of-discretion constitutional-rights criminal-defendant criminal-procedure due-process judicial-discretion judicial-review liberty second-circuit trial-court | Whether the abuse of discretion standard imposed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is Constitutionally impermissible - wher… | -6.5 |
| 20-6647 | Douglas Charles Knicely v. United States | Fourth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 4th-amendment appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court fourth-circuit motion-to-suppress pretrial-motion search-and-seizure standard-of-review | Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit erred when it affirmed the district court's denial of Appellants' pretrial motion to… | -6.5 |
| 20-6648 | Gezo Goeong Edwards, aka Gezo Edwards, aka Zo v. United States | District of Columbia | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment habeas-corpus privacy search-and-seizure standing state-court-conviction | Whether the lower court and relevant state bar association of a state should be conducted for the issuance of a COP in that state, lower court shall a… | -6.5 |
| 20-6655 | Alonso Sanchez Ochoa v. United States | Fifth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | consecutive-sentence criminal-sentencing defense-counsel district-court pre-sentence-report probation-officer relevant-conduct sentencing | 1. Is it reasonable for a District court to order a consecutive sentence despite an agreement among Probation Officer, Pre-Sentence Report Addendum, a… | -6.5 |
| 20-6660 | Shusta Traverse Gumbs v. United States | Eleventh Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | circuit-split criminal-law criminal-procedure deadly-weapon intent jury-instruction jury-instructions lesser-included-offense united-states-v-feola | I. Whether the district court erred in giving only the first sentence of Mr. Gumbs' request to charge on use of a deadly weapon in light of the Circui… | -6.5 |
| 20-6666 | Sebastian L. Eccleston v. United States | Tenth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | bureau-of-prisons concurrent-sentences consecutive-sentences criminal-justice due-process federal-prisoner federal-sentencing sentencing-statutes state-judiciary | In Setser v. United States, this Court construed the third sentence of 18 USC §3584(a) to be inapplicable in cases where a federal sentence is imposed… | -6.5 |
| 20-6671 | Sarah Melisa Cox, aka Sarah Cox, aka Sarah Cunningham v. United States | Ninth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | print or publish the distribution of child pornog child-pornography circuit-split communication communication-standard criminal-law federal-criminal-law notice notice-requirement statutory-interpretation | Whether a communication between just two individuals is sufficient contact to satisfy the requirement of giving notice to make, print or publish the d… | -6.5 |
| 20-6674 | Tony Chevallier v. United States | Fourth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | criminal-acts criminal-procedure drug-trafficking due-process judicial-discretion jury-conviction sentencing-factors sentencing-guidelines statutory-range uncharged-conduct | I. When are trial judges prohibited from considering as sentencing factors criminal acts that a defendant was neither charged nor convicted of? And in… | -6.5 |
| 20-6683 | Reynaldo Diaz-Guzman v. United States | Sixth Circuit | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | civil-rights constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process evidence-suppression judicial-discretion jurisdiction prosecutorial-misconduct standing subject-matter-jurisdiction | Whether The court of Appeals erred and abused its discretion For Forfeiting The challenge The indictment and argue For dismissal For lack of subject m… | -6.5 |