Fareed Sepehry-Fard v. Court of Appeal of California, Sixth Appellate District, et al.
DueProcess
Whether lower courts should continue to allow international drug cartels, pedophiles, sex and human traffickers, and MS13 gangsters to use people's homes as conduits and ruses to launder unlawfully obtained monies when the attorneys do not have power of attorney
QUESTION PRESENTED Petitioner demanded that two court administrators and , several BAR attorneys to undergo a complete medical examination as to their mental competency due to their irrational repeated behavior. The basis for this demand was the strong threat to our Republic's National Security where two individuals who have vacated office and have not been public servants for several . years for failure to post bond in county recorder conducted clear collusion with several BAR attorneys who based on proof positive on records do not have and never ever had any power of attorney from neither the alleged Plaintiff nor from US Bank to systemically commit acts of piracy, grand theft and deprivation of Petitioner's inalienable rights under the color of the law. | In spite of these facts presented to the two ex court there is no Plaintiff in court, based on proof positive on records, the two ex court administrators have -1 continued to terrorize Petitioner based on what seems to be their mental incompetency. Moreover, both California Sixth District Court of Appeal and the California Supreme court expressly set aside these facts, as if they did not exist, creating another layer of prima facie evidence of collusion and conspiracy to continue to aid and abet laundering monies for pedophiles, drug cartels, MS13, sex and human traffickers using ruses such as people's homes as conduits to conduct these unlawful acts against the Petitioner and other People of this Republic. The question presented is: . 1) — whether this court should continue to allow lower courts to be used by international drug cartels, pedophiles, sex and human traffickers and MS13 gangsters to use people's homes . : as conduits and ruses to launder unlawfully obtained monies when the attorneys do not have any power of attorney from neither the alleged Plaintiff nor from US Bank and there is absolutely no relationship between the homeowner and the alleged claimant?. 2. 2) Should this court end the lower courts' aiding and . abetting laundering monies for inter alia sex and human traffickers, pedophiles, MS13 and drug cartels committed and perfected by mentally incompetent ex court administrators and their culprits, as they are national security risks to our Republic or continue to take part in these activities by ignoring these facts and avoiding to take a decision in having the two ex court administrators and the attorneys to undergo a complete medical examination as to their mental competency and the subsequent derivative actions to guard against any and all encroachments to our National Security? ° . .