No. 20-6655
Alonso Sanchez Ochoa v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: consecutive-sentence criminal-sentencing defense-counsel district-court pre-sentence-report probation-officer relevant-conduct sentencing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-01-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it reasonable for a District Court to order a consecutive sentence despite an agreement among Probation Officer, Pre-Sentence Report Addendum, and Defense Counsel that a particular state prosecution is for relevant conduct?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Is it reasonable for a District Court to order a consecutive sentence despite an agreement among Probation Officer, Pre-Sentence Report Addendum, and Defense Counsel that a particular state prosecution is for relevant conduct? i
Docket Entries
2021-01-25
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2020-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 20, 2021)
Attorneys
Alonso Sanchez Ochoa
Brett D. Boone — Law Office of Brett D. Boone, Petitioner
Brett D. Boone — Law Office of Brett D. Boone, Petitioner
United States
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent