Whether the court of appeals erred and abused its discretion in rejecting the challenge to the indictment and argument for dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED sO | bon SORE Whether The. count of Appeals eRned and. abused tts of / | rePPecttye For Forltng Te challenge The tndictmrent ad ARG ue spa Fon drsméissal Por lack of subyect matter quntsdlotren § Where evyrdence extst That the Honsnrable day wells: state coun t had Full gunbed Fc tron gover Appellant's Case when The Government Filed the Fedenal tndratment en December, (3, 2017. Ap pellan.t was tt present. xed bePone a magistrate sud e Without whne ces Sany dela x. Ne feder ala rndvetwent tag vot asaled? ( oncaver,, Phere wasnt any ongang ., Mies frag ation fr App ellarcts care? Apjedtan + waen't con victed./n the State cage ‘ofe related Change Ll the ceyernment str hauled Ap pelle pe ne Sedenad count with out the $ tute gudge Re lingu's h Senisde yrion ( ; Whethee The Kppeals count ented and abused t% drseue firm ss denty Appellant's ORG WM EMKS That The pRasecutor Vielated hes Constitat onal Duties +e Disclosure } y withholding Favorable evtdenc€ From The dePense, causing presudice? Reas nable sues be coul d Fmd The Appeals count assessment o& kppellants constitutronal clams debataffe. Whether The count of Appeal ented and abured (0 des cnetron vn denying Appellants arguments without address rng ep! Phe ewdence and angumentr on Ther mensts? 2 J