Tracy Alan Barnett v. United States
HabeasCorpus
Are United States District Courts required to address and resolve all constitutional claims or issues raised in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to satisfy the Habeas provisions of the United States Constitution, or may they ignore certain constitutional claims?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED | Are United _Sishs istrieh Courks required to address antl_resolve all _ tonstitetional dais or _sves_tuised’ ina LEASE 8 2256 Motion _te_satisty the Habeas pravisions of the Unibet! States Constitution, or _rmy they tgnere_ter tain tonstityherd tlaias? 2. Porsnant te Federal Rules of Civil Precedre, file BYO), where a US. istrict Court rakes__on some of the Constitvtional eliiins tale in a 82255 Motion, but file to acknowledge or adjinllcabe obtr tains 10 the original _pabeas_pobig , tay He Disteict Lurt eather a titel order" dhspike tad there ave_wnvesolved claims 2 ] .