No. 20-691

Lih Bin Shih v. Nathan Brooks Parnell

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2020-11-18
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-rights clean-hands-doctrine due-process fifth-amendment first-amendment fourteenth-amendment free-speech government-petition petition-clause police-reports retaliation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-01-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Court may deny Petitioner's First Amendment right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : 1. Whether the Court may deny Petitioner's First Amendment right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances? In particular when the Government had recognized the petition as credible and accepted for redress. Whether the Court may . terminate Petitioner's right to communicate with Government and _ hinder investigation? 2. Whether the Court may make thorough omission of all dirty hands evidence by Respondents and not apply the Clean Hands Doctrine to foreclose Respondents seeking relief? Whether the Court may consider eight real-time and well-timed false 911 calls and false police reports prior to trial for retaliation not dirty enough to invoke equitable defense for Petitioner? In particular, police was not a witness at trial after Respondents’ extensive involvement of police, and Respondents provided no defense to Petitioner’s allegations that all 911 calls and police reports were false. 3. Whether the Court may deny Petitioner’s due process guaranteed in the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments to silence Petitioner by refusing to accept even one page of evidence at trial, by disposing two cases without recess in 45 minutes, by depriving Petitioner’s right to defend against Respondents’ claim, and by eliminating the statutory compliant lawful oral record? . ; é LIST OF PROCEEDINGS 1. The Superior Court of the San Diego County, San Diego, California. Case Nos: Complainant Nathan Parnell vs. Lih-Bin Shih, and Elder Abuse Counterclaim Complainant Lih-Bin Shih vs. Nathan Parnell and Julie Parnell. Decision Date: August 8, 2018 2. California Fourth District Appellate Court, Division One Case No. D0O74805 Appellant: Lih-Bin Shih vs. Nathan Parnell. Decision Date: March 25, 2020, Petition for Rehearing: Denied May 7, 2020 3. The Supreme Court of the State of California, Petition for Review, Petitioner Lih-Bin Shih vs. Nathan Parnell and Julie Parnell, Case No. $262093. Petition for Review: Denied June 17, 2020

Docket Entries

2021-01-25
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2020-11-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 18, 2020)

Attorneys

Lih Bin Shih
Lih-Bin Shih — Petitioner
Lih-Bin Shih — Petitioner