Carolyn Barnes v. United States, et al.
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess FirstAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Whether it violates due process to ignore a Motion to Recuse and apply the wrong standard of review
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether it violates due process to ignore a Motion to Recuse and apply the wrong standard of review. Whether the extended preemptive “review” or “screening” process and summary disposal of claims is a delegated authority within the Constitution, or “required” by statute, or authorized by law; or whether it is merely a judicial subterfuge to discriminate against a targeted group of litigants or class of claims in violation of the United States Constitution and laws of this Republic? Whether juridical bills of pains and penalties imposed in an ex post facto manner without due process may be utilized under our Constitution to retaliate against and punish a person who has done nothing more than exercise a fundamental right? 2