No. 20-604
InfoBionic, Inc. v. Cardionet, LLC, et al.
Tags: 35-usc-101 abstract-idea federal-circuit innovation longstanding-human-practice patent-eligibility patent-monopoly statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2021-01-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Federal Circuit has properly narrowed the scope of the abstract idea exception under 35 U.S.C. § 101.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Federal Circuit has properly narrowed the scope of the abstract idea exception under 35 U.S.C. § 101
Docket Entries
2021-01-25
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2021-01-06
Reply of petitioner InfoBionic, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2020-12-21
Brief of respondents Cardionet, LLC, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-11-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 21, 2020.
2020-11-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 7, 2020 to December 21, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 7, 2020)
Attorneys
Cardionet, LLC, et al.
Ching-Lee Fukuda — Sidley Austin LLP, Respondent
InfoBionic, Inc.
Gregory George Garre — Latham & Watkins LLP, Petitioner