Whether the Fifth Circuit properly applied the plain error standard of review in determining that petitioner failed to establish plain error regarding his entitlement to a minor or mitigating role adjustment under the United States Sentencing Guidelines, where petitioner did not raise this argument at sentencing and the Fifth Circuit's application of plain error review conflicts with this Court's precedent in Davis v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (2020).

Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in refusing to review an unpreserved factual argument for plain error