No. 20-6411

Miguel A. Ramirez v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2020-11-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-conviction criminal-procedure cumulative-error defendant-rights due-process evidence-admissibility jury-instructions prejudicial-error sexual-abuse
Latest Conference: 2021-01-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the trial court's instructions on continuous sexual abuse were prejudicial

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | 1. whethe2'@ 4u2 Nstuct! Ru ‘ in Continedas SeXuar abuse nan thts . 3 LN Oa\ \NFEAT ORimre Was, PRejudicical ? | Zs Whethe2 the +ia| Court's UNaNimity ENshuction IN RP ely Cellowed Jurots +0 Convict Pebtioneg’s OF Con dn'uous Selual abuse based on &@ Single Ger P © 3, Whethed Cumulative nsRuctionat error Rendered PetHonerd's Rial UNFEIR UndeR Hee US, Constbutiongar? Zs my ‘ ; ,

Docket Entries

2021-01-25
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2020-10-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2020)

Attorneys

Miguel A. Ramirez
Miguel A. Ramirez — Petitioner
Miguel A. Ramirez — Petitioner