Artem Koshkalda v. Seiko Epson Corporation, et al.
DueProcess
Did the district court err in denying the motion to set aside a notice of voluntary dismissal?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did The United States District Court Central District of California ! err in denying Plaintiff's Motion To Set Aside a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal ? Filed By Fox Rothschild LLP on behalf of Trustee 3? 2. Did the CA Court err in denying Plaintiffs Motion To Set Aside a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure * Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), where Trustee did not file a motion for substitution as a plaintiff pursuant to FRCP Rule 25(c)? 3. Did The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit * err in affirming the CA Court orders? ' The United States District Court Central District of California ("CA Court"); 2 Notice of Voluntary dismissal of the Case with prejudice filed by Fox Rothschild LLP on behalf of Trustee (hereinafter "Dismissal"); 3 E. Lynn Schoenmann, trustee of the Koshkalda's | Estate in the case No. 18bk30016-HLB ("Trustee"); 4 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("FRCP"); ° The United States Court of Appeals of the Ninth | Circuit ("Ninth Circuit"); ii II.