No. 20-6371

Antoine Moseley v. Daniel Clarke

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment double-jeopardy double-jeopardy-clause due-process fact-finding fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment insufficient-evidence prosecutorial-misconduct statutory-elements
Key Terms:
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-01-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Double Jeopardy

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented 1. Double Jeopardy: Pages 6 -! 3 Whether there were post-acquittal fact-finding proceedings going to guilt or innocence of count 3 and count 4 that shared identical statutory elements. Exposing the petitioner to a second jeopardy which violates the first protection of the double jeopardy clause. In violation of petitioner's right to due process, . as guaranteed by the United States Constitution, 5“ and 14" Amendments. 2. Prosecutorial Misconduct: Pages | Y -27 Whether the prosecutor failed to disclose two oral statements from two of its chief witnesses (the medical expert and the alleged victim) not allowing the petitioner to make an informed decision before waiving his constitutional rights to a jury trial, and selecting to take a bench trial as a result of the state withholding those two undisclosed oral statements. In violation of the petitioner’s right to due process, as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, 5“ and 14 Amendments. 3. Insufficient evidence: Pages 2. g ~ 3 [ | Whether the evidence at trial was insufficient. When the | trial court created its own theory of why the petitioner allegedly assaulted Doe. Due to which the state nor the defense ever argued this erroneous theory at trial. This is despite the trial court previously ruling during ; ; cross-examination of the alleged victim, that the alleged / : victim’s testimony will stand, which reflected the court’s . theory never existed. In violation of the petitioners right to due process, as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, 5% and 14 Amendments.

Docket Entries

2021-01-25
Petition DENIED.
2021-01-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.
2020-08-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 21, 2020)

Attorneys

Antoine Moseley
Antoine Moseley — Petitioner
Antoine Moseley — Petitioner