Question not identified

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , Why is The Svpceme Covet case law, Along with the Appeal laxt Courts case law % the distict courts cASe law, thatis From the same district & Appenllant courts, wot Accepted ? Why didu't the AppeallAut Court grant the RA boner A COA‘ certificate of Aopealabi lity. when the (ssves Are the SAme in Hoclow's cAse & the Fetitoner’s cASe. buF A ‘COA’ WAS granted iN Hucloco's case ? oO Why didw+ defense counBel in vestigate the legality of the stop & Accest of the Rtitionec ONCe it WAS Known there WAS NO waccant, fesulting to there being NO ocobable cAuse te stop or Accest the Retitioner c , Why did clefenise counsel give Petitioner the wrong legal Advice About The “Good faith Nocteine “AO lying To the. dlismissAl of the sugeression motion, when there was vo wacrawt oc proot of Negligance ON behalf of Anothe police employ ee ° Why oily + clefeuse. counsel clo ANY iAvestt gation) isto the facts of the cAse once counse! was inemedl by Petitioner of the circumstances of the multiole searches e . why didn't clefense couse} clo Any investig ating into the Facts of the case. About the claim of “the sm ell of mar) vANA “ used As the means to search the Petitioners Vehicle twice ge pecsow Three times, to cliscover that there was no physical evidence of ANY MAC) \oANA ° Qu es tions Presenttecl Coon Nueef ) a Why chid clefense counise| coherce Petitioner to cance] ; the Wo se Notice of Appeal becudse of the “Coocl Faith Doctre | when itis clear the “Good Faith Doctrine “vill Not stan wi Yhout ANY evidence 4 Why did KCPD officers Allow Petitioner to dive Away, A + fest Sig hh Ng, (fit was Kwown that the Retitionter hacl An active warrant & alriving onl A suspended license e . why dlidy + Sergeant Benson stop Rtitioner when he tiest seen Petitiouec, but later weat fo look for Rtitioner ww aw Area he seen Petitioner in A month prior ¢ Why oli Detective Schwalm follow Rtihowes, whew RelrhionerWAS wot the suspect that the survelliewce was for ? . why WAS Detective Schwalm: calling other ofbicers fo do A car check for AN Active warrant oc A sus pendec! license ° . Lf Secgeaut Bealson stopped Rt tioner Ler AN Active Acces) wAccant : tahy did he D) why diel he pull ow the opposite side of the street é 2) Question Petitioner About the individual that was Kwowal for shooting Petitioner Imowths ecior ? 3) AFtec quustioning Rtitioner did Sergeant Benson park his _ Cac behind Petilioner e q) Pot search Rtitioner three differeut Himes ? 8) BeArch Poti boners vehicle tuice ¢ 6) hy WASN + Peditioner booked! & charged Lor AAl Active woacrant £ Ques tion SS Reseattec (contin ved) what haoeried to the MACI\UANA that Serg e Ant Benson gid he recovered from Petitioner ? WAs the "smell of marijuana A pd lice tactic USecf to goon A Fishing expidition ? why was the 4th Amerclmeat violation Not considered at the district couck Jevel oc the Aopeallant leve] & Why was defense counsel Wot Conlsidered for Ine Mictive Assistance of Counsel (LAC) at the district court level oc the Appeal ant couct level e thy WAS t there Attempt made by officer schwaln to Stop Rj tioner PA trathe violation OCCU ed}, or ANy meattion of pursing Retitiover fo stop him ° Did defense: Counsel ever have knowkdge of the police reports ?