No. 20-6083
John Oliver Wooten v. Patrick Warren, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: deference factual-error federal-courts federal-review habeas-corpus habeas-review sixth-amendment sixth-circuit standard-of-review state-court state-courts
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-12-04
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a state court decision entitled to deference on federal habeas review if it is undisputed that the state court applied the wrong standard of review because of a clear factual error?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Is a state court decision entitled to deference on federal habeas review if it is undisputed that the state court applied the wrong standard of review because of a clear factual error?
Docket Entries
2020-12-07
Petition DENIED.
2020-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.
2020-11-05
Waiver of right of respondent Patrick Warren, Warden to respond filed.
2020-10-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 19, 2020)
Attorneys
John Wooten
Benton C. Martin — Federal Community Defender, Petitioner
Benton C. Martin — Federal Community Defender, Petitioner
Patrick Warren, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent