No. 20-6284
D'Angelo Domingo Davis, aka D'Angelo Dominico Davis, aka Deangelo Domingo Davis v. United States
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-924(c) bank-robbery carter-v-united-states circuit-precedent crime-of-violence criminal-intent federal-bank-robbery force-clause statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is federal bank robbery a crime of violence under the force clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Is federal bank robbery a crime of violence under the force clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), in light of this Court’s holding in Carter v. United States, 530 U.S. 255, 268 (2000), that the offense is a general intent crime, and given decades of circuit precedent holding that intimidation under the statute does not require purposeful, violent conduct? pretix
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-02-10
Reply of petitioner D'Angelo Davis filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-13
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2020-12-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 13, 2021.
2020-12-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 14, 2020 to January 13, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 14, 2020)
Attorneys
D'Angelo Davis
Erin Jolene Radekin — Law Office of Erin J. Radekin, Petitioner
Erin Jolene Radekin — Law Office of Erin J. Radekin, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent