No. 20-6438
Hector D. Molina v. Robert W. Fox, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-intent criminal-liability due-process fair-trial gang-conspiracy habeas-corpus natural-and-probable-consequences premeditated-murder
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-01-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether conviction for premeditated murder committed by others while the defendant was incarcerated based on the natural and probable consequences of a gang conspiracy violate Due Process where gang membership substitutes for the knowledge and intent elements of the crimes?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Whether conviction for premeditated murder committed by others while the defendant was incarcerated based on the natural and probable consequences of a gang conspiracy violate Due Process where gang membership substitutes for the knowledge and intent elements of the crimes? i
Docket Entries
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-08
Waiver of right of respondent Robert W. Fox, Warden to respond filed.
2020-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2020)
Attorneys
Hector Molina
Dena Marie Young — Law Offices of Dena Marie Young, Petitioner
Robert W. Fox, Warden
Peggy S. Ruffra — California Department of Justice, Respondent