No. 20-6447

Michael Anthony Cernak v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-11-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: armed-bank-robbery categorical-approach crime-of-violence elements-clause extortion federal-armed-bank-robbery federal-criminal-law intimidation mandatory-sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Takings HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-06-17 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether federal armed bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) qualifies as a crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented for Review Federal armed bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) can be committed “by force and violence, or by intimidation ... or... by extortion.” Federal armed bank robbery therefore does not require, as an element of the offense, the specific intent to use, the attempt to use, or the threat to use violent physical force. Additionally, numerous federal circuits interpret federal bank robbery to include the nonviolent conduct of intimidation and extortion as a request for money. Does federal armed bank robbery qualify as a crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A)? List of Proceedings 1. U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, United States v. Anthony Michael Cernak, Case Nos. 2:17-cv-00762-KJD: Dkt. 166, Order denying motion to vacate and denying a certificate of appealability entered March 31, 2020; Dkt. 167, final judgment entered March 31, 2020. 2. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, United States v. Michael Anthony Cernak, Case No. 20-16167: Dkt. 3, Order denying certificate of appealability entered August 7, 2020. ii

Docket Entries

2021-06-21
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-02-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
2021-02-08
Reply of petitioner Michael Cernak filed. (Distributed)
2021-01-27
Memorandum of respondent United States of America filed.
2020-12-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 27, 2021.
2020-12-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 28, 2020 to January 27, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 28, 2020)

Attorneys

Michael Cernak
Amy B. ClearyFederal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Petitioner
Amy B. ClearyFederal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent